Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · ARE

United Arab Emirates

Baseline index 11.94Rank 29 of 197TransitionalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years5.5rank 180 of 197 · 3 years: 5.6
Worst case−5.3%Infrastructure collapse · tail −4.6%
Opportunity · 10 years+10.3rank 46 of 197 · 3 years: +8.8
Best case+32Great-power détente · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed49%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.20expected index points from best practice
Breadth11 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkPolitical Institutions & Civic Participationweakest point in 5 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; industry as a share of gdp; adult obesity rate; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in United Arab Emirates’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.82−0.63−1.18−0.51022Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.5 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.64−0.54−0.99−0.43022Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7 · Foundational
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.69−0.47−0.94−0.41019Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.3 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.62−0.43−0.87−0.38▲ 114Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.6 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.57−0.40−0.84−0.37▲ 115Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.5 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.69−0.35−0.70−0.31▲ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.57−0.35−0.75−0.32015Population Health 11.5 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.54−0.34−0.64−0.28013Maritime Power 8.4 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.37−0.26−0.38−0.16010Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.6 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.39−0.23−0.43−0.19▲ 110Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.5 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.30−0.22−0.43−0.1909Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.9 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.36−0.19−0.39−0.1708Energy Infrastructure 11.9 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.41−0.17−0.36−0.16▲ 16Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.7 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.19−0.13−0.24−0.10▲ 37Energy Technologies 7.7 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.79−0.92−0.33−0.33−0.33−0.82−0.77−0.75−0.66
Pandemic−0.57−0.29−0.23−0.69−0.60−0.65−0.60−0.59−0.59
AI diffusion shock−0.62−0.26−0.23−0.69−0.52−0.71−0.60−0.33−0.29
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.55−0.23−0.20·−0.53−0.51−0.53−0.52−0.78
Global financial crisis−0.20−0.20−0.18−0.40−0.40−0.50−0.67−0.57−0.46
Single-supplier cut-off−0.67−0.18−0.23−0.29·−0.58·−0.59−0.59
Food and water shock−0.04−0.40−0.18−0.49−0.46−0.50−0.23−0.40−0.45
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.56−0.47·−0.25−0.54−0.21−0.43−0.55
Legitimacy crisis−0.19·−0.39−0.19−0.45−0.63−0.51··
Hybrid campaign−0.17−0.37−0.40·−0.41−0.38·−0.15−0.15
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.18−0.10−0.25−0.23−0.31−0.38−0.23−0.26
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.38−0.11−0.28−0.13−0.32−0.17−0.13−0.13
Mass displacement·−0.18−0.13−0.36−0.29−0.40−0.17−0.02·
Energy supply shock−0.03−0.18−0.07−0.07−0.07−0.17−0.20−0.19−0.17

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what United Arab Emirates is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+31.537.86.37017Trade Policy & Market Access 13.3 · Established
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+29.432.63.15144Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+24.625.91.3526Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+22.740.017.36742Energy Infrastructure 12.4 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+15.731.315.64027Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.5 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+9.110.91.85334Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+1.917.315.459144Technical & Vocational Skills 10 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−2.713.215.94891Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 6.7 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−7.51.18.747189Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 6.7 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−21.97.829.752163Energy Technologies 8 · Foundational