Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Russia and Eurasia · UKR

Ukraine

Baseline index 9.40Rank 52 of 197TransitionalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years9.6rank 153 of 197 · 3 years: 9.4
Worst case−6.6%Pandemic · tail −6.3%
Opportunity · 10 years−3.0rank 103 of 197 · 3 years: +0.5
Best case+22Energy abundance · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed39%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.49expected index points from best practice
Breadth6 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid campaign, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of population aged 65 and over; internet users as a share of population; remittances relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Ukraine’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.64−0.62−1.00−0.44023Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.8 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.67−0.58−0.92−0.40▼ 121Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.70−0.57−1.01−0.44016Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 7.2 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.55−0.56−0.82−0.36▼ 117Investment Attraction & Projection 5.2 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.52−0.52−0.76−0.33▼ 119Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.1 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.52−0.42−0.68−0.30010Energy Technologies 5.4 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06High 0.71−0.40−0.79−0.34▼ 312Maritime Power 5.7 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.38−0.37−0.54−0.24▲ 210Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.7 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.50−0.35−0.59−0.26012Maritime Power 5.9 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.50−0.32−0.54−0.24▼ 112Financial System Depth & Access 7.2 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.53−0.31−0.54−0.24▼ 18Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 7.8 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.45−0.29−0.45−0.20▲ 19Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.6 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Low 0.29−0.25−0.39−0.1708Trade Facilitation & Logistics 7.9 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Low 0.22−0.12−0.20−0.0906Labour & Employment 8.4 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.66−0.33−0.27−0.79−0.70−0.75−0.70−0.68−0.68
AI diffusion shock−0.76−0.32−0.28−0.84−0.63−0.87−0.74−0.41−0.36
Infrastructure collapse−0.71−0.83−0.30−0.30−0.30−0.74−0.69−0.68−0.59
Global financial crisis−0.28−0.28−0.26−0.57−0.57−0.71−0.95−0.81−0.65
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.43−0.24−0.60−0.54−0.74−0.89−0.54−0.61
Energy supply shock−0.10−0.59−0.22−0.25−0.25−0.56−0.66−0.63−0.56
Hybrid campaign−0.30−0.66−0.71·−0.73−0.68·−0.27−0.27
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.47−0.20−0.18·−0.46−0.44−0.46−0.45−0.67
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.58−0.49·−0.26−0.56−0.22−0.45−0.57
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.67−0.20−0.49−0.22−0.55−0.30−0.22−0.22
Legitimacy crisis−0.23·−0.46−0.23−0.53−0.74−0.61··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.56−0.15−0.19−0.24·−0.48·−0.49−0.49
Food and water shock−0.03−0.28−0.13−0.34−0.33−0.35−0.16−0.28−0.32
Mass displacement·−0.12−0.09−0.24−0.20−0.27−0.12−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Ukraine is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+21.924.22.34149Energy Technologies 6.4 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+15.728.112.44469Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.810.32.54842Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 8.8 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+5.311.56.141118Investment Attraction & Projection 6.3 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+4.115.411.348116Trade Facilitation & Logistics 8.5 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+2.219.417.34862Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 8.4 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−8.428.036.442119Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−13.714.828.53375Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.5 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−18.616.535.138181Investment Attraction & Projection 6.3 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−36.89.846.542196Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7 · Foundational