Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · SYR

Syria

Baseline index 2.22Rank 185 of 197InceptionGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years45.9rank 20 of 197 · 3 years: 41.2
Worst case−42.4%Sovereign funding crisis · tail −38.1%
Opportunity · 10 years−13.2rank 175 of 197 · 3 years: −16.1
Best case+6Middle East settlement · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed8%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.03expected index points from best practice
Breadth11 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkPolitical Institutions & Civic Participationweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: consumer price inflation; youth unemployment rate; little renewable water per head; public debt relative to gdp; adult obesity rate; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Syria’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.75−0.94−0.98−0.47▼ 415Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.80−0.92−1.03−0.46▼ 419Trade Facilitation & Logistics 0.4 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.50−0.67−0.70−0.32▲ 111Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.76−0.65−0.68−0.33▼ 211Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.52−0.62−0.68−0.31010Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.43−0.58−0.63−0.28▲ 214Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.46−0.55−0.59−0.26▲ 211Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.48−0.50−0.57−0.25▲ 413Economic Leverage & Dependence 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.60−0.47−0.52−0.23▼ 313Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.37−0.36−0.40−0.18▲ 210Financial System Depth & Access 1.1 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.34−0.32−0.37−0.16▼ 110Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.4 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.23−0.29−0.31−0.14▲ 36Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.24−0.28−0.31−0.14▲ 98Energy Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Low 0.19−0.17−0.18−0.08▲ 43Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Sovereign funding crisis−0.10−0.86−0.48−1.20−1.06−1.37−1.14−1.06−1.21
Food and water shock−0.10−1.06−0.48−1.29−1.22−1.31−0.62−1.04−1.19
Global financial crisis−0.25−0.36−0.32−0.72−0.72−0.88−1.07−0.96−0.76
Legitimacy crisis−0.35·−1.06−0.54−1.24−1.51−1.14··
Infrastructure collapse−0.47−0.98−0.35−0.35−0.35−0.87−0.73−0.80−0.70
Pandemic−0.41−0.32−0.26−0.78−0.68−0.73−0.68−0.67−0.67
AI diffusion shock−0.42−0.32−0.29−0.86−0.65−0.89−0.75−0.42−0.37
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.83−0.70·−0.37−0.80−0.32−0.64−0.78
Mass displacement·−0.48−0.36−0.99−0.81−1.07−0.47−0.06·
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.74−0.22−0.55−0.25−0.62−0.33−0.25−0.25
Hybrid campaign−0.18−0.53−0.58·−0.59−0.56·−0.22−0.22
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.26−0.16−0.15·−0.38−0.37−0.38−0.37−0.56
Energy supply shock−0.07−0.40−0.15−0.17−0.17−0.37−0.44−0.43−0.38
Single-supplier cut-off−0.24−0.09−0.12−0.15·−0.30·−0.30−0.30

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Syria is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+5.610.24.514112Trade Facilitation & Logistics 2.5 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+4.56.41.910124Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+1.76.34.6985Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+0.12.82.79131Energy Technologies 1 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−4.73.78.49165Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−4.94.19.08185Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 1 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−12.25.417.69143Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−15.81.717.57178Investment Attraction & Projection 1 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−22.64.927.67192Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−40.92.243.15185Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception