Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · SRB

Serbia

Baseline index 8.96Rank 58 of 197FoundationalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years12.4rank 131 of 197 · 3 years: 12.9
Worst case−8.6%Pandemic · tail −8.4%
Opportunity · 10 years+6.1rank 58 of 197 · 3 years: +6.3
Best case+30Energy abundance · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed35%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.73expected index points from best practice
Breadth9 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over; youth unemployment rate; remittances relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Serbia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.78−0.77−1.22−0.53▼ 126Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.3 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09High 0.86−0.75−1.11−0.49▼ 124Energy Technologies 2.3 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.79−0.74−1.17−0.51▼ 226Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 7.8 · Foundational
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.79−0.69−1.08−0.47026Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.66−0.64−0.96−0.42▲ 122Sensing, Timing & Navigation 3.5 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.74−0.62−0.87−0.39▼ 218Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.59−0.56−0.83−0.36019Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.6 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.74−0.47−0.75−0.33021Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.4 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.53−0.39−0.58−0.26013Maritime Power 0.2 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.41−0.38−0.60−0.26015Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 6 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.55−0.36−0.57−0.25▼ 111Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.47−0.29−0.51−0.22▲ 215Energy Infrastructure 8.3 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.48−0.24−0.42−0.1809Political Institutions & Civic Participation 9.5 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Low 0.14−0.12−0.19−0.08▲ 210Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.82−0.41−0.34−1.00−0.87−0.93−0.87−0.85−0.85
Energy supply shock−0.17−1.04−0.39−0.43−0.43−0.97−1.16−1.11−0.99
Global financial crisis−0.37−0.37−0.33−0.74−0.74−0.93−1.24−1.06−0.85
AI diffusion shock−0.91−0.38−0.34−1.01−0.76−1.04−0.88−0.49−0.43
Infrastructure collapse−0.80−0.93−0.33−0.33−0.33−0.83−0.77−0.76−0.66
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.02−0.83·−0.46−0.98−0.39−0.78−1.01
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.71−0.30−0.27·−0.69−0.67−0.69−0.68−1.02
Single-supplier cut-off−0.91−0.25−0.32−0.39·−0.79·−0.80−0.80
Hybrid campaign−0.29−0.63−0.68·−0.70−0.66·−0.26−0.26
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.32−0.18−0.44−0.40−0.55−0.67−0.40−0.46
Legitimacy crisis−0.26·−0.52−0.26−0.61−0.85−0.70··
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.60−0.18−0.45−0.20−0.50−0.27−0.20−0.20
Mass displacement·−0.24−0.18−0.50−0.41−0.56−0.24−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.01−0.13−0.06−0.16−0.15−0.17−0.08−0.13−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Serbia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+30.430.70.33434Energy Technologies 4 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+28.430.72.34346Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.8 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+23.925.21.34541Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.3 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+9.323.814.54561Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.3 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+1.310.99.53968Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 5.4 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−1.212.413.649161Trade Facilitation & Logistics 9 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−2.47.610.042115Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.8 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−2.96.08.951172Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 9.5 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−7.920.128.03058Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−9.025.734.744122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.8 · Foundational