Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · QAT

Qatar

Baseline index 9.39Rank 53 of 197TransitionalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years7.5rank 167 of 197 · 3 years: 7.3
Worst case−8.7%Infrastructure collapse · tail −6.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−0.4rank 86 of 197 · 3 years: −1.9
Best case+20100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed40%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.36expected index points from best practice
Breadth6 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkPolitical Institutions & Civic Participationweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population; industry as a share of gdp; little renewable water per head; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Qatar’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.86−0.82−1.23−0.54021Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.1 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.66−0.56−0.90−0.40▲ 112Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.60−0.55−0.92−0.40▲ 211Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.3 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.53−0.42−0.79−0.35▲ 38Political Institutions & Civic Participation 2.8 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.51−0.40−0.71−0.3108Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.55−0.40−0.73−0.3208Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 8.6 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.61−0.35−0.61−0.2709Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.1 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.47−0.34−0.55−0.24▲ 26Maritime Power 5.6 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.32−0.27−0.46−0.20▲ 36Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.1 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.39−0.26−0.43−0.1903Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.4 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.38−0.22−0.41−0.18▲ 15Energy Infrastructure 7.5 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Low 0.27−0.20−0.28−0.12▲ 14Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.1 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.36−0.17−0.32−0.1404Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.1 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.19−0.15−0.24−0.11▲ 53Energy Technologies 3 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.02−1.20−0.43−0.43−0.43−1.07−1.00−0.98−0.85
AI diffusion shock−0.73−0.31−0.28−0.82−0.61−0.84−0.72−0.39−0.35
Pandemic−0.58−0.29−0.24−0.71−0.62−0.66−0.62−0.61−0.61
Global financial crisis−0.21−0.21−0.19−0.42−0.42−0.53−0.71−0.60−0.48
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.51−0.21−0.19·−0.50−0.48−0.50−0.49−0.73
Food and water shock−0.05−0.46−0.21−0.56−0.54−0.57−0.27−0.46−0.52
Single-supplier cut-off−0.68−0.18−0.23−0.29·−0.58·−0.59−0.59
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.56−0.47·−0.25−0.54−0.21−0.43−0.55
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.22−0.13−0.31−0.28−0.38−0.46−0.28−0.32
Hybrid campaign−0.20−0.43−0.46·−0.47−0.44·−0.18−0.18
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.45−0.14−0.34−0.15−0.38−0.20−0.15−0.15
Legitimacy crisis−0.15·−0.30−0.15−0.35−0.49−0.40··
Mass displacement·−0.17−0.13−0.35−0.28−0.39−0.17−0.02·
Energy supply shock−0.04−0.21−0.08−0.09−0.09−0.20−0.24−0.23−0.20

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Qatar is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+19.523.03.53960Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+17.519.01.43820Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+14.122.28.14847Export Capability & Sophistication 8 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+6.929.823.05099Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+4.47.02.63761Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed+1.717.215.52742Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−3.20.43.640174Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−10.97.318.133157Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Loser−12.310.623.048189Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−37.44.942.233168Energy Technologies 3.4 · Nascent