Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · PSE

Palestine

Baseline index 3.72Rank 154 of 197NascentGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years33.6rank 44 of 197 · 3 years: 31.8
Worst case−26.1%Food and water shock · tail −24.7%
Opportunity · 10 years−4.6rank 112 of 197 · 3 years: −6.8
Best case+11Middle East settlement · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed14%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.19expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Chokepoint closure, Legitimacy crisis, Energy supply shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; consumer price inflation; youth unemployment rate; little renewable water per head; share of population aged under 15; internet users as a share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Palestine’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Food and water shock S11High 0.89−0.97−1.15−0.51▼ 825Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.90−0.89−0.98−0.45▼ 517Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.74−0.89−1.00−0.45▼ 614Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.71−0.80−0.90−0.40▲ 113Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.67−0.71−0.87−0.39▼ 514Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.56−0.68−0.80−0.35▲ 213Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.4 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.52−0.65−0.78−0.35▲ 410Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.1 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.79−0.63−0.76−0.34▼ 28Monetary & Currency Capability 1.1 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.44−0.56−0.65−0.29▲ 1011Investment Attraction & Projection 1.5 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.38−0.44−0.50−0.22▲ 65Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.41−0.35−0.44−0.19▲ 75Transport Infrastructure 1.5 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.37−0.33−0.38−0.17▼ 24Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.43−0.30−0.38−0.1604Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Low 0.32−0.27−0.31−0.14▲ 73Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Food and water shock−0.08−1.12−0.44−1.37−1.29−1.40−0.65−1.12−1.28
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.55−0.82·−0.70−1.51−0.60−1.21−1.55
Infrastructure collapse−0.71−1.37−0.44−0.49−0.49−1.23−1.14−1.12−0.98
Energy supply shock−0.08−1.14−0.38−0.48−0.48−1.07−1.27−1.22−1.09
AI diffusion shock−0.66−0.41−0.33−1.10−0.82−1.13−0.96−0.53−0.47
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.57−0.29−0.79−0.71−0.98−1.19−0.71−0.82
Pandemic−0.54−0.36−0.26−0.87−0.76−0.82−0.76−0.75−0.75
Legitimacy crisis−0.37·−0.80−0.48−1.13−1.58−1.29··
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.29−0.23−0.57−0.57−0.71−0.95−0.82−0.65
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.42−0.24−0.19·−0.57−0.55−0.57−0.56−0.83
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.73−0.19−0.54−0.24−0.61−0.32−0.24−0.24
Hybrid campaign−0.22−0.57−0.48·−0.64−0.60·−0.24−0.24
Mass displacement·−0.31−0.20−0.62−0.51−0.70−0.30−0.04·
Single-supplier cut-off−0.42−0.15−0.17−0.24·−0.48·−0.49−0.49

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Palestine is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+11.315.13.91774Transport Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+10.512.62.11875Transport Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+7.59.82.412105Energy Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+6.710.84.01446Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+3.28.95.71670Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+3.010.57.425101Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 4.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+1.68.56.816131Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−9.45.414.815161Investment Attraction & Projection 2.7 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−11.511.122.616162Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−33.56.339.810170Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception