Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · OMN

Oman

Baseline index 8.03Rank 68 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years11.3rank 140 of 197 · 3 years: 11.2
Worst case−10.1%Infrastructure collapse · tail −8.7%
Opportunity · 10 years−2.0rank 99 of 197 · 3 years: −3.1
Best case+17Great-power détente · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed35%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.59expected index points from best practice
Breadth9 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkPolitical Institutions & Civic Participationweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Geoeconomic confrontation, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; industry as a share of gdp; internet users as a share of population; little renewable water per head; urban share of population; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Oman’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.80−0.81−1.14−0.51▼ 127Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.64−0.67−0.98−0.43▼ 122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.5 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.69−0.62−0.95−0.42▼ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.65−0.60−0.88−0.39021Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.58−0.54−0.86−0.38▲ 121Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.2 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.48−0.45−0.70−0.30017Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.4 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.60−0.45−0.79−0.34▲ 119Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 9.5 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.52−0.41−0.53−0.23015Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.1 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.64−0.39−0.64−0.28017Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.50−0.36−0.59−0.26▲ 110Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 6.2 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.43−0.33−0.48−0.2108Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.56−0.28−0.50−0.22▲ 111Political Institutions & Civic Participation 3.4 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.43−0.27−0.47−0.21▲ 112Energy Infrastructure 6.8 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.19−0.16−0.24−0.11▲ 312Energy Technologies 2.4 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.97−1.18−0.42−0.42−0.42−1.06−0.99−0.97−0.85
Pandemic−0.71−0.36−0.29−0.86−0.75−0.81−0.75−0.74−0.74
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.74−0.34−0.30·−0.78−0.76−0.78−0.77−1.15
AI diffusion shock−0.73−0.33−0.30−0.88−0.66−0.91−0.77−0.43−0.38
Global financial crisis−0.27−0.27−0.24−0.54−0.54−0.68−0.90−0.78−0.62
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.37−0.21−0.52−0.47−0.64−0.78−0.47−0.53
Food and water shock−0.05−0.51−0.23−0.63−0.60−0.64−0.30−0.51−0.59
Legitimacy crisis−0.30·−0.61−0.30−0.71−0.99−0.81··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.72−0.21−0.27−0.33·−0.66·−0.67−0.67
Chokepoint closure−0.05−0.60−0.51·−0.27−0.58−0.23−0.46−0.59
Hybrid campaign−0.24−0.53−0.58·−0.59−0.55·−0.22−0.22
Mass displacement·−0.29−0.22−0.59−0.48−0.66−0.28−0.03·
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.55−0.17−0.41−0.18−0.46−0.25−0.18−0.18
Energy supply shock−0.04−0.22−0.08−0.09−0.09−0.21−0.25−0.24−0.21

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Oman is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+16.626.19.54140Export Capability & Sophistication 7 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+13.818.64.92974Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+7.616.79.13151Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+5.68.42.83153Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.8 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+2.621.218.544140Energy Infrastructure 7.5 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+0.929.328.445135Energy Infrastructure 7.5 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+0.24.74.637140Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−5.513.018.530110Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−9.013.422.42161Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−44.54.448.829171Energy Technologies 2.8 · Inception