Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · MNE

Montenegro

Baseline index 6.35Rank 92 of 197FoundationalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years20.8rank 90 of 197 · 3 years: 21.1
Worst case−14.4%Pandemic · tail −14.1%
Opportunity · 10 years−2.5rank 101 of 197 · 3 years: −1.9
Best case+20Energy abundance · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed26%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.07expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population; refugees hosted per head of population; remittances relative to gdp; youth unemployment rate; share of population aged 65 and over; trade in goods and services relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Montenegro’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.91−1.16−0.51▼ 420Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.82−0.91−1.24−0.55▼ 315Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.80−0.87−1.18−0.52▼ 315Investment Attraction & Projection 3.9 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.82−0.79−1.08−0.48▼ 211Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.72−0.77−1.00−0.45▼ 115Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.81−0.73−0.96−0.42▼ 515Maritime Power 0.9 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.61−0.65−0.83−0.37▼ 210Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.51−0.54−0.74−0.32010Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.1 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.63−0.48−0.61−0.27▼ 211Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.54−0.44−0.59−0.26▼ 29Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.4 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.58−0.39−0.59−0.26▼ 17Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.5 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.49−0.34−0.54−0.2308Energy Infrastructure 5.7 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.57−0.32−0.50−0.2207Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 8 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.16−0.14−0.21−0.09▲ 23Resource Infrastructure 3.4 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.14−1.28−0.48−0.53−0.53−1.20−1.42−1.37−1.21
Pandemic−0.85−0.49−0.40−1.20−1.05−1.12−1.05−1.03−1.03
Global financial crisis−0.43−0.44−0.39−0.87−0.87−1.09−1.46−1.25−1.00
AI diffusion shock−0.84−0.44−0.40−1.18−0.89−1.22−1.03−0.57−0.51
Infrastructure collapse−0.81−1.15−0.41−0.41−0.41−1.03−0.96−0.94−0.82
Chokepoint closure−0.09−1.20−1.02·−0.54−1.15−0.46−0.92−1.19
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.70−0.35−0.32·−0.83−0.80−0.83−0.81−1.21
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.45−0.25−0.63−0.57−0.78−0.94−0.57−0.65
Single-supplier cut-off−0.79−0.26−0.33−0.41·−0.83·−0.84−0.84
Hybrid campaign−0.33−0.71−0.77·−0.79−0.74·−0.30−0.30
Legitimacy crisis−0.29·−0.58−0.29−0.67−0.94−0.77··
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.71−0.21−0.52−0.24−0.59−0.31−0.24−0.24
Mass displacement·−0.32−0.24−0.66−0.54−0.74−0.32−0.04·
Food and water shock−0.02−0.16−0.07−0.20−0.19−0.20−0.10−0.16−0.19

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Montenegro is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+20.420.70.32154Energy Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+19.220.81.63552Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.5 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+15.818.62.82568Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−1.310.511.835163Investment Attraction & Projection 5.7 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−1.916.318.230121Export Capability & Sophistication 5.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−2.38.110.42689Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−3.87.110.944179Financial Regulation & Integrity 8.3 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−8.94.213.224143Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−20.912.433.318108Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−24.813.938.726183Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception