Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Russia and Eurasia · MDA

Moldova

Baseline index 6.34Rank 93 of 197FoundationalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years15.1rank 116 of 197 · 3 years: 14.9
Worst case−11.3%Energy supply shock · tail −10.6%
Opportunity · 10 years−6.8rank 136 of 197 · 3 years: −6.2
Best case+6Energy abundance · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed26%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.79expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; no coastline; refugees hosted per head of population; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; low life expectancy at birth.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Moldova’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.71−0.72−0.91−0.40▲ 216Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.60−0.66−0.85−0.38▲ 217Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.67−0.65−0.90−0.40▲ 122Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.67−0.63−0.77−0.34016Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.57−0.63−0.88−0.38▲ 120Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.50−0.55−0.74−0.33▲ 219Investment Attraction & Projection 4.2 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.41−0.44−0.57−0.25▲ 111Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.38−0.40−0.55−0.24▲ 213Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.4 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.66−0.38−0.58−0.25▼ 112Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 7.3 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.46−0.35−0.45−0.20▲ 214Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.41−0.33−0.44−0.19013Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Low 0.32−0.30−0.43−0.19▲ 111Resource Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.38−0.25−0.38−0.17▲ 27Force Generation & Mobilisation 6.6 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10Low 0.29−0.21−0.32−0.14▲ 311Energy Infrastructure 5.4 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.16−1.01−0.34−0.42−0.42−0.95−1.13−1.08−0.96
Infrastructure collapse−0.81−0.96−0.31−0.34−0.34−0.86−0.80−0.79−0.69
AI diffusion shock−0.80−0.36−0.29−0.96−0.72−0.99−0.84−0.47−0.41
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.07−0.72·−0.48−1.03−0.41−0.82−1.05
Pandemic−0.68−0.34−0.25−0.82−0.72−0.77−0.72−0.70−0.70
Global financial crisis−0.28−0.28−0.22−0.55−0.55−0.69−0.92−0.79−0.63
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.56−0.24−0.19·−0.55−0.53−0.55−0.54−0.81
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.33−0.17−0.46−0.42−0.57−0.70−0.42−0.48
Mass displacement·−0.39−0.26−0.80−0.65−0.90−0.38−0.05·
Single-supplier cut-off−0.66−0.18−0.21−0.29·−0.59·−0.60−0.60
Hybrid campaign−0.25−0.55−0.51·−0.62−0.58·−0.23−0.23
Food and water shock−0.03−0.34−0.14−0.42−0.40−0.43−0.20−0.34−0.39
Legitimacy crisis−0.19·−0.33−0.19−0.43−0.60−0.49··
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.43−0.12−0.32−0.14−0.36−0.19−0.14−0.14

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Moldova is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+6.217.511.321110Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+3.610.16.533132Investment Attraction & Projection 5.3 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+3.05.82.84299Financial Regulation & Integrity 7.8 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+0.312.512.230110Investment Attraction & Projection 5.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−0.815.516.327150Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−1.915.417.333150Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.8 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−9.212.121.329143Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−17.38.525.91986Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−18.117.535.628163Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−20.06.026.026188Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3 · Nascent