Vulnerability and opportunity
Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.
Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.
Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid campaign, Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of population aged 65 and over; internet users as a share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; refugees hosted per head of population; adult obesity rate.
Downside scenarios: load test
Change in Lithuania’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.
| Scenario | Exposure | Change | No response | Best practice | Rank shift | Bands lost | Weakest point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy supply shock S09 | High 0.92 | −0.75 | −1.19 | −0.52 | ▼ 2 | 19 | Energy Technologies 3 · Nascent |
| Pandemic S14 | High 0.87 | −0.75 | −1.34 | −0.59 | 0 | 22 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6.5 · Foundational |
| AI diffusion shock S13 | High 0.82 | −0.63 | −1.13 | −0.49 | 0 | 19 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2 · Inception |
| Chokepoint closure S05 | High 0.82 | −0.62 | −0.97 | −0.42 | ▼ 1 | 15 | Maritime Power 3.2 · Nascent |
| Infrastructure collapse S12 | High 0.72 | −0.61 | −1.04 | −0.45 | ▲ 3 | 16 | Sensing, Timing & Navigation 3.3 · Nascent |
| Global financial crisis S03 | High 0.73 | −0.56 | −1.08 | −0.47 | ▼ 1 | 14 | Economic Output & Productivity 9.4 · Transitional |
| Hybrid campaign S06 | High 0.88 | −0.56 | −0.98 | −0.43 | ▼ 3 | 18 | Maritime Power 3.2 · Nascent |
| Geoeconomic confrontation S01 | High 0.65 | −0.53 | −0.92 | −0.40 | 0 | 13 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception |
| Single-supplier cut-off S02 | High 0.78 | −0.47 | −0.79 | −0.35 | 0 | 16 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.9 · Inception |
| Sovereign funding crisis S04 | Medium 0.45 | −0.34 | −0.65 | −0.29 | ▲ 2 | 8 | Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 9.3 · Transitional |
| Disaster in the core S10 | Medium 0.49 | −0.26 | −0.54 | −0.23 | ▲ 2 | 9 | Energy Infrastructure 9.4 · Transitional |
| Mass displacement S08 | Medium 0.55 | −0.24 | −0.48 | −0.21 | 0 | 7 | Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 11.6 · Transitional |
| Legitimacy crisis S07 | Medium 0.42 | −0.21 | −0.43 | −0.19 | ▲ 2 | 6 | Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10 · Transitional |
| Food and water shock S11 | Low 0.19 | −0.13 | −0.25 | −0.11 | ▲ 2 | 7 | Resource Infrastructure 6.4 · Foundational |
Where each scenario lands
Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.
| Scenario | CT | SI | NS | HC | II | GI | FS | PI | TI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy supply shock | −0.18 | −1.05 | −0.40 | −0.44 | −0.44 | −0.99 | −1.17 | −1.13 | −1.00 |
| Pandemic | −0.80 | −0.40 | −0.33 | −0.97 | −0.85 | −0.91 | −0.85 | −0.83 | −0.83 |
| AI diffusion shock | −0.82 | −0.34 | −0.31 | −0.91 | −0.68 | −0.94 | −0.80 | −0.44 | −0.39 |
| Chokepoint closure | −0.08 | −1.02 | −0.86 | · | −0.46 | −0.98 | −0.39 | −0.78 | −1.01 |
| Infrastructure collapse | −0.76 | −0.89 | −0.32 | −0.32 | −0.32 | −0.79 | −0.74 | −0.72 | −0.63 |
| Global financial crisis | −0.28 | −0.28 | −0.25 | −0.57 | −0.57 | −0.71 | −0.94 | −0.81 | −0.65 |
| Hybrid campaign | −0.42 | −0.91 | −0.98 | · | −1.01 | −0.95 | · | −0.38 | −0.38 |
| Geoeconomic confrontation | −0.68 | −0.28 | −0.25 | · | −0.66 | −0.64 | −0.66 | −0.65 | −0.97 |
| Single-supplier cut-off | −0.90 | −0.24 | −0.31 | −0.38 | · | −0.78 | · | −0.79 | −0.79 |
| Sovereign funding crisis | −0.04 | −0.28 | −0.16 | −0.40 | −0.36 | −0.49 | −0.59 | −0.36 | −0.41 |
| Disaster in the core | −0.02 | −0.55 | −0.16 | −0.40 | −0.18 | −0.46 | −0.24 | −0.18 | −0.18 |
| Mass displacement | · | −0.24 | −0.18 | −0.49 | −0.40 | −0.55 | −0.24 | −0.03 | · |
| Legitimacy crisis | −0.16 | · | −0.31 | −0.16 | −0.37 | −0.51 | −0.42 | · | · |
| Food and water shock | −0.02 | −0.15 | −0.07 | −0.19 | −0.18 | −0.19 | −0.09 | −0.15 | −0.17 |
Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.
Upside scenarios: capture test
Net position in each upside scenario: what Lithuania is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.
| Scenario | Position | Net | Capture | Loss | Readiness | Rank | Binding capability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗ | Gainer | +38.5 | 40.3 | 1.8 | 50 | 29 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational |
| Energy abundance S16 ↗ | Gainer | +30.2 | 39.2 | 9.0 | 40 | 35 | Energy Technologies 4.8 · Nascent |
| Middle East settlement S21 ↗ | Gainer | +26.1 | 31.7 | 5.6 | 54 | 35 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 9.5 · Transitional |
| Great-power détente S18 ↗ | Gainer | +19.2 | 30.6 | 11.4 | 53 | 34 | Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 9.5 · Transitional |
| Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗ | Mixed | +6.1 | 24.5 | 18.4 | 36 | 36 | Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.3 · Nascent |
| Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗ | Mixed | +5.8 | 12.0 | 6.3 | 53 | 46 | Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 8.4 · Foundational |
| Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗ | Mixed | +4.6 | 31.4 | 26.8 | 51 | 63 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational |
| Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗ | Mixed | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 67 | 146 | Health System Capability 13 · Established |
| Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗ | Mixed | −1.2 | 12.4 | 13.6 | 56 | 160 | Energy Infrastructure 10.1 · Transitional |
| Yield revolution S22 ↗ | Mixed | −1.6 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 50 | 108 | Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational |