Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · LIE

Liechtenstein

Baseline index 7.22Rank 78 of 197FoundationalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years16.1rank 110 of 197 · 3 years: 17.8
Worst case−12.5%Energy supply shock · tail −11.9%
Opportunity · 10 years−0.1rank 85 of 197 · 3 years: +0.4
Best case+21Energy abundance · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed29%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.87expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; internet users as a share of population; industry as a share of gdp; share of population aged 65 and over; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Liechtenstein’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.98−0.90−1.15−0.52▼ 627Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 1.00−0.89−1.27−0.57▼ 622Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.85−0.79−1.20−0.54▼ 318Economic Output & Productivity 6.3 · Foundational
Pandemic S14High 0.65−0.67−0.93−0.42▼ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.81−0.63−1.01−0.46018Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.96−0.61−0.82−0.38▼ 216Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.55−0.57−0.73−0.33▲ 317Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.60−0.53−0.61−0.28▼ 113Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.55−0.44−0.50−0.23▼ 210Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.55−0.26−0.46−0.20▲ 18Social Infrastructure 9.8 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.44−0.23−0.39−0.18▲ 27Force Generation & Mobilisation 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.19−0.17−0.27−0.12▲ 56Energy Infrastructure 4.4 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Low 0.23−0.14−0.24−0.11▲ 45Transport Infrastructure 4.2 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Low 0.14−0.12−0.18−0.08▲ 55Resource Infrastructure 0.2 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.08−1.10−0.20−0.57−0.57−1.29−1.53−1.47−1.31
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.80−0.48−0.19·−1.20−1.16−1.20−1.18−1.77
Global financial crisis−0.35−0.39−0.17−0.83−0.83−1.04−1.39−1.19−0.95
Pandemic−0.58−0.36−0.15−0.92−0.80−0.86−0.80−0.79−0.79
AI diffusion shock−0.62−0.35−0.16−1.00−0.75−1.03−0.88−0.48−0.43
Single-supplier cut-off−0.84−0.31−0.19−0.58·−1.17·−1.19−1.19
Infrastructure collapse−0.55−0.84−0.18−0.32−0.32−0.80−0.75−0.73−0.64
Chokepoint closure−0.08−0.84−0.24·−0.45−0.97−0.39−0.77−1.00
Hybrid campaign−0.31−0.76−0.36·−0.93−0.87·−0.35−0.35
Mass displacement·−0.27−0.11−0.56−0.46−0.64−0.27−0.03·
Legitimacy crisis−0.17·−0.16−0.19−0.45−0.62−0.51··
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.15−0.05−0.21−0.19−0.26−0.31−0.19−0.21
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.29−0.05−0.22−0.10−0.25−0.13−0.10−0.10
Food and water shock−0.01−0.14−0.03−0.17−0.16−0.17−0.08−0.14−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Liechtenstein is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+21.121.30.22151Energy Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+15.529.413.93744Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.5 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+11.914.62.62582Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+8.89.91.12387Alliances & Security Cooperation 2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−2.84.87.63193Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−4.214.718.92153Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−7.61.69.225135Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−8.10.08.260190Health System Capability 11.3 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−17.111.428.529159Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.4 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Loser−18.76.124.836194Transport Infrastructure 4.6 · Nascent