Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · LVA

Latvia

Baseline index 9.89Rank 48 of 197TransitionalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years12.4rank 132 of 197 · 3 years: 13.1
Worst case−8.1%Energy supply shock · tail −7.6%
Opportunity · 10 years+9.5rank 48 of 197 · 3 years: +10.2
Best case+31100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed40%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.68expected index points from best practice
Breadth12 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid campaign, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of population aged 65 and over; internet users as a share of population; refugees hosted per head of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; few months of imports covered by reserves.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Latvia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.80−1.17−0.51▼ 229Energy Technologies 1.3 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.86−0.80−1.33−0.58031Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.1 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.83−0.66−1.13−0.50031Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.73−0.65−1.05−0.46029Sensing, Timing & Navigation 2 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.81−0.64−0.96−0.42022Resource Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06High 0.89−0.59−0.98−0.43▼ 122Air Power 2.4 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.70−0.58−1.05−0.46026Economic Output & Productivity 7.8 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.63−0.54−0.88−0.39025Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.72−0.47−0.73−0.32022Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.43−0.34−0.62−0.27019Energy Infrastructure 8.4 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.56−0.26−0.49−0.22011Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 11 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.41−0.22−0.42−0.18▲ 17Information Environment & Strategic Communication 9 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10Low 0.32−0.18−0.35−0.15▲ 114Energy Infrastructure 8.6 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.15−0.11−0.20−0.09▲ 111Resource Infrastructure 4.5 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.19−1.11−0.42−0.46−0.46−1.04−1.24−1.19−1.06
Pandemic−0.85−0.43−0.35−1.03−0.90−0.97−0.90−0.89−0.89
AI diffusion shock−0.87−0.36−0.32−0.96−0.72−0.99−0.84−0.46−0.41
Infrastructure collapse−0.82−0.95−0.34−0.34−0.34−0.85−0.79−0.78−0.68
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.06−0.89·−0.47−1.02−0.41−0.81−1.04
Hybrid campaign−0.44−0.96−1.04·−1.07−1.00·−0.40−0.40
Global financial crisis−0.29−0.29−0.26−0.58−0.58−0.73−0.97−0.83−0.66
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.69−0.29−0.26·−0.67−0.65−0.67−0.66−0.99
Single-supplier cut-off−0.91−0.24−0.31−0.39·−0.79·−0.80−0.80
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.28−0.16−0.40−0.36−0.49−0.59−0.36−0.41
Mass displacement·−0.26−0.20−0.53−0.44−0.60−0.25−0.03·
Legitimacy crisis−0.16·−0.32−0.16−0.37−0.52−0.42··
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.37−0.11−0.27−0.12−0.31−0.16−0.12−0.12
Food and water shock−0.01−0.13−0.06−0.16−0.15−0.16−0.07−0.13−0.14

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Latvia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+30.832.82.04139Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.6 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+29.532.63.13438Energy Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+26.829.42.65033Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.5 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+14.727.312.54846Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.5 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+5.011.76.74852Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 7 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed+2.221.419.33140Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+0.112.011.952152Energy Infrastructure 9.1 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed0.06.76.663147Health System Capability 12 · Established
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−2.66.28.842117Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.6 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−4.324.929.243104Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.6 · Nascent