Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · JOR

Jordan

Baseline index 7.50Rank 74 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years17.1rank 105 of 197 · 3 years: 16.3
Worst case−11.2%Infrastructure collapse · tail −10.3%
Opportunity · 10 years+7.4rank 55 of 197 · 3 years: +5.9
Best case+41Middle East settlement · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed31%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.94expected index points from best practice
Breadth3 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock. Highest exposure indicators: land borders with states in conflict or collapse; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; youth unemployment rate; little renewable water per head; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Jordan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.81−0.84−1.16−0.51022Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.3 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.93−0.78−1.10−0.48▼ 418Maritime Power 0.8 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.69−0.70−1.03−0.45▼ 118Economic Output & Productivity 5.1 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09High 0.74−0.68−0.95−0.42▼ 218Energy Technologies 2 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.64−0.68−0.98−0.43017Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.1 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.70−0.67−0.94−0.42▼ 118Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.58−0.57−0.81−0.36▼ 216Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.56−0.55−0.81−0.35▼ 214Political Institutions & Civic Participation 5.8 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.99−0.55−0.88−0.38▼ 415Political Institutions & Civic Participation 5.1 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11High 0.61−0.52−0.80−0.35▼ 111Resource Infrastructure 6.1 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10High 0.71−0.49−0.78−0.34▼ 214Energy Infrastructure 6.7 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.65−0.48−0.67−0.29▼ 114Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.6 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.48−0.36−0.53−0.23010Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.5 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.48−0.34−0.47−0.21▲ 16Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.01−1.22−0.44−0.44−0.44−1.09−1.02−1.00−0.87
Chokepoint closure−0.10−1.28−1.08·−0.57−1.23−0.49−0.98−1.26
Global financial crisis−0.35−0.35−0.32−0.70−0.70−0.88−1.17−1.01−0.80
Energy supply shock−0.16−0.95−0.36−0.40−0.40−0.89−1.06−1.02−0.91
Pandemic−0.71−0.36−0.30−0.88−0.77−0.83−0.77−0.76−0.76
AI diffusion shock−0.80−0.37−0.34−1.00−0.75−1.03−0.87−0.48−0.43
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.66−0.31−0.28·−0.71−0.69−0.71−0.70−1.05
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.46−0.26−0.64−0.58−0.79−0.96−0.58−0.66
Mass displacement·−0.56−0.42−1.14−0.93−1.28−0.54−0.07·
Food and water shock−0.06−0.59−0.27−0.72−0.69−0.74−0.34−0.59−0.68
Disaster in the core−0.03−1.01−0.30−0.74−0.34−0.84−0.45−0.34−0.34
Legitimacy crisis−0.35·−0.71−0.35−0.82−1.15−0.94··
Hybrid campaign−0.27−0.58−0.63·−0.64−0.60·−0.24−0.24
Single-supplier cut-off−0.61−0.18−0.23−0.28·−0.57·−0.58−0.58

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Jordan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+41.043.92.9448Energy Infrastructure 8 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+22.123.81.82848Energy Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+18.824.75.94126Technical & Vocational Skills 7.5 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+15.120.45.33271Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+10.013.03.13230Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+9.920.810.93957Export Capability & Sophistication 7 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+8.319.611.33350Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.813.15.34243Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 7.7 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+0.718.417.73170Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.8 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−20.412.032.419100Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception