Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · ISR

Israel

Baseline index 14.46Rank 16 of 197EstablishedGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years4.4rank 188 of 197 · 3 years: 4.0
Worst case−3.4%Infrastructure collapse · tail −3.1%
Opportunity · 10 years+23.5rank 16 of 197 · 3 years: +23.5
Best case+44100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 9 of 10
Shock absorbed54%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.11expected index points from best practice
Breadth11 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkEnergy Infrastructureweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: land borders with states in conflict or collapse; little renewable water per head; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Israel’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.80−0.50−1.16−0.46017Energy Infrastructure 9.7 · Transitional
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.73−0.44−1.01−0.43014Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 12.7 · Established
Pandemic S14High 0.64−0.44−1.00−0.43▲ 114Trade Facilitation & Logistics 12.7 · Established
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.50−0.37−0.71−0.31010Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 9.5 · Transitional
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.52−0.37−0.77−0.34▲ 113Economic Output & Productivity 11.8 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.59−0.35−0.79−0.33012Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 9.5 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.53−0.33−0.64−0.27▲ 216Resource Infrastructure 9.7 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08High 0.85−0.32−0.76−0.32010Foundational Education 12.9 · Established
Disaster in the core S10High 0.62−0.29−0.68−0.29015Energy Infrastructure 10 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.37−0.26−0.53−0.23▲ 110Energy Infrastructure 10.2 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.48−0.24−0.49−0.2209Justice System & Fundamental Rights 12.3 · Established
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.47−0.21−0.53−0.20▲ 29Energy Infrastructure 10.2 · Transitional
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.28−0.19−0.37−0.16▲ 29Resource Infrastructure 10.1 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02Low 0.26−0.13−0.27−0.11▲ 27Resource Infrastructure 10.3 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.62−0.72−0.28−0.26−0.26−0.64−0.60−0.59−0.51
AI diffusion shock−0.57−0.24−0.24−0.63−0.47−0.65−0.55−0.30−0.27
Pandemic−0.46−0.23−0.21−0.56−0.49−0.53−0.49−0.48−0.48
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.47−0.20−0.20·−0.46−0.44−0.46−0.45−0.67
Global financial crisis−0.18−0.18−0.18−0.37−0.37−0.46−0.61−0.53−0.42
Food and water shock−0.04−0.39−0.20−0.48−0.46−0.49−0.23−0.39−0.45
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.54−0.49·−0.24−0.52−0.21−0.41−0.53
Mass displacement·−0.33−0.27−0.67−0.55−0.75−0.32−0.04·
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.59−0.20−0.44−0.20−0.50−0.26−0.20−0.20
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.21−0.13−0.30−0.27−0.37−0.45−0.27−0.31
Legitimacy crisis−0.18·−0.39−0.18−0.41−0.57−0.47··
Hybrid campaign−0.15−0.34−0.39·−0.37−0.35·−0.14−0.14
Energy supply shock−0.04−0.27−0.11−0.11−0.11−0.25−0.29−0.28−0.25
Single-supplier cut-off−0.25−0.07−0.10−0.11·−0.22·−0.22−0.22

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Israel is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+43.746.32.67222Information Environment & Strategic Communication 13.7 · Established
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+39.645.76.15810Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10.3 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+38.250.212.06413Energy Infrastructure 10.8 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+23.726.62.9619Energy Infrastructure 10.8 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+22.729.16.45923Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10.3 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+19.128.29.1717Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 13.3 · Established
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+18.331.813.57518Social Infrastructure 14.8 · Established
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+15.216.71.56815Transport Infrastructure 12.4 · Established
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+12.021.39.26182Energy Infrastructure 10.8 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+1.84.42.670116Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 13.3 · Established