Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · IRQ

Iraq

Baseline index 4.69Rank 126 of 197NascentGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fuel-dependent. Budgets built on oil and gas: the upside scenarios are their downside. One of 15 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years21.5rank 88 of 197 · 3 years: 21.2
Worst case−17.4%Infrastructure collapse · tail −15.0%
Opportunity · 10 years−13.2rank 176 of 197 · 3 years: −14.1
Best case+3Yield revolution · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed20%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.90expected index points from best practice
Breadth7 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; industry as a share of gdp; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Iraq’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.71−0.82−0.98−0.44▲ 221Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.61−0.68−0.80−0.36▼ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.50−0.62−0.77−0.34▲ 317Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.54−0.61−0.73−0.33▲ 118Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.72−0.59−0.73−0.32▼ 210Information Environment & Strategic Communication 2.9 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.54−0.55−0.71−0.31▼ 118Trade Facilitation & Logistics 3.8 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.39−0.48−0.59−0.26▲ 69Investment Attraction & Projection 2.4 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.70−0.47−0.62−0.27▼ 215Internal Security & Order 4.4 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.55−0.42−0.53−0.24▲ 110Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.43−0.38−0.50−0.22▲ 513Maritime Power 2.3 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.41−0.36−0.46−0.20▼ 110Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.7 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.29−0.35−0.42−0.19▲ 58Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.9 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.42−0.35−0.46−0.20▲ 210Financial System Depth & Access 4.1 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.19−0.19−0.24−0.11▲ 125Energy Technologies 1.2 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.85−1.22−0.44−0.44−0.44−1.09−1.02−0.99−0.87
AI diffusion shock−0.71−0.38−0.34−1.02−0.76−1.05−0.89−0.49−0.44
Pandemic−0.60−0.34−0.27−0.81−0.71−0.76−0.71−0.70−0.70
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.65−0.33−0.30·−0.78−0.75−0.78−0.76−1.14
Legitimacy crisis−0.41·−0.86−0.43−1.01−1.40−1.15··
Food and water shock−0.06−0.62−0.28−0.76−0.72−0.77−0.36−0.62−0.71
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.22−0.49−0.49−0.61−0.81−0.70−0.56
Mass displacement·−0.48−0.36−0.97−0.80−1.09−0.46−0.06·
Single-supplier cut-off−0.69−0.22−0.29−0.36·−0.72·−0.73−0.73
Chokepoint closure−0.05−0.63−0.53·−0.28−0.60−0.24−0.48−0.62
Hybrid campaign−0.27−0.59−0.64·−0.65−0.61·−0.24−0.24
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.29−0.16−0.40−0.36−0.50−0.60−0.36−0.41
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.72−0.22−0.54−0.24−0.60−0.32−0.24−0.24
Energy supply shock−0.04−0.26−0.10−0.11−0.11−0.25−0.29−0.28−0.25

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Iraq is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+3.47.34.01970Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+2.89.76.919123Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+1.912.710.82080Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−1.413.414.822164Investment Attraction & Projection 3.3 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−4.23.07.225183Financial Regulation & Integrity 4.3 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−4.310.114.420132Investment Attraction & Projection 3.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−11.910.222.117163Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Loser−27.418.145.528176Trade Facilitation & Logistics 5 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−28.56.935.412155Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−69.12.571.617189Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception