Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · ISL

Iceland

Baseline index 9.63Rank 50 of 197TransitionalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years11.2rank 142 of 197 · 3 years: 11.4
Worst case−8.2%Infrastructure collapse · tail −8.0%
Opportunity · 10 years+11.4rank 41 of 197 · 3 years: +12.3
Best case+36Energy abundance · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed41%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.58expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Hybrid campaign, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population; refugees hosted per head of population; public debt relative to gdp; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Iceland’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.84−0.79−1.19−0.53▼ 128Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.5 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.93−0.78−1.19−0.52▼ 428Energy Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.84−0.74−1.29−0.57027Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.6 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.86−0.62−1.15−0.51022Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.76−0.61−1.12−0.49▲ 122Economic Output & Productivity 7.8 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.77−0.61−0.89−0.40▼ 421Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 0.6 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.56−0.50−0.78−0.35▲ 118Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.64−0.42−0.63−0.28▲ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.1 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.55−0.42−0.60−0.27014Air Power 0.8 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.47−0.35−0.67−0.29▲ 112Energy Infrastructure 8 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10High 0.62−0.30−0.67−0.29▲ 111Energy Infrastructure 7.9 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.48−0.24−0.49−0.21▲ 17Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.6 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.56−0.22−0.49−0.2105Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 12 · Established
Food and water shock S11Low 0.13−0.09−0.17−0.07▲ 15Resource Infrastructure 5.3 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.95−1.16−0.41−0.41−0.41−1.04−0.97−0.95−0.83
Energy supply shock−0.18−1.09−0.40−0.45−0.45−1.02−1.21−1.17−1.04
Pandemic−0.76−0.40−0.32−0.97−0.84−0.91−0.84−0.83−0.83
AI diffusion shock−0.78−0.34−0.31−0.91−0.68−0.94−0.79−0.44−0.39
Global financial crisis−0.31−0.31−0.28−0.62−0.62−0.77−1.03−0.88−0.70
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.02−0.79·−0.46−0.98−0.39−0.78−1.01
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.62−0.27−0.24·−0.62−0.60−0.62−0.61−0.91
Single-supplier cut-off−0.78−0.22−0.28−0.35·−0.70·−0.72−0.72
Hybrid campaign−0.32−0.69−0.72·−0.77−0.72·−0.29−0.29
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.29−0.17−0.41−0.37−0.51−0.61−0.37−0.42
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.63−0.19−0.47−0.21−0.53−0.28−0.21−0.21
Legitimacy crisis−0.17·−0.35−0.17−0.41−0.57−0.47··
Mass displacement·−0.23−0.17−0.46−0.38−0.52−0.22−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.01−0.10−0.05−0.12−0.12−0.13−0.06−0.10−0.11

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Iceland is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+35.736.00.23628Energy Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+34.436.21.84635Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+28.229.21.04931Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.3 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+12.324.512.24651Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8.3 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed+7.822.014.23133Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+4.89.64.84253Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+0.919.518.64882Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+0.913.112.251149Energy Infrastructure 8.8 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−3.52.66.169178Financial Regulation & Integrity 13 · Established
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−5.23.99.244124Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational