Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · GRC

Greece

Baseline index 10.61Rank 42 of 197TransitionalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years10.1rank 149 of 197 · 3 years: 9.9
Worst case−7.6%Pandemic · tail −7.0%
Opportunity · 10 years+8.3rank 50 of 197 · 3 years: +8.7
Best case+35100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed42%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.54expected index points from best practice
Breadth0 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: public debt relative to gdp; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of population aged 65 and over; few months of imports covered by reserves; internet users as a share of population; youth unemployment rate; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Greece’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.86−0.80−1.33−0.58▼ 122Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.8 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.73−1.18−0.51▼ 123Energy Technologies 3.7 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.83−0.70−1.14−0.50▼ 120Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.1 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.83−0.68−1.24−0.54▼ 118Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 8.6 · Foundational
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.75−0.66−1.08−0.47021Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.2 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.68−0.56−0.98−0.43▼ 215Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 8.6 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.77−0.51−0.92−0.40015Resource Infrastructure 8.7 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.56−0.47−0.79−0.35▲ 112Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.7 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.61−0.37−0.62−0.27010Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.6 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.53−0.35−0.58−0.2607Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.1 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.59−0.34−0.64−0.28010Energy Infrastructure 9.2 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.51−0.31−0.53−0.23▲ 110Information Environment & Strategic Communication 7.8 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.52−0.25−0.46−0.20▼ 19Labour & Employment 10.5 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Low 0.19−0.13−0.26−0.11▲ 10Resource Infrastructure 9.7 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.85−0.43−0.35−1.04−0.91−0.97−0.91−0.89−0.89
Energy supply shock−0.17−1.03−0.38−0.43−0.43−0.96−1.14−1.10−0.98
AI diffusion shock−0.92−0.38−0.34−1.02−0.76−1.05−0.89−0.49−0.44
Global financial crisis−0.34−0.34−0.31−0.69−0.69−0.86−1.15−0.98−0.79
Infrastructure collapse−0.82−0.96−0.34−0.34−0.34−0.86−0.80−0.78−0.69
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.47−0.26−0.65−0.58−0.80−0.97−0.58−0.67
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.84−0.71·−0.38−0.81−0.32−0.64−0.83
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.60−0.25−0.22·−0.58−0.56−0.58−0.57−0.86
Single-supplier cut-off−0.72−0.19−0.25−0.31·−0.62·−0.63−0.63
Hybrid campaign−0.26−0.56−0.61·−0.62−0.59·−0.23−0.23
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.71−0.21−0.53−0.24−0.59−0.32−0.24−0.24
Legitimacy crisis−0.23·−0.45−0.23−0.53−0.73−0.60··
Mass displacement·−0.25−0.19−0.51−0.42−0.57−0.24−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.01−0.15−0.07−0.18−0.17−0.19−0.09−0.15−0.17

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Greece is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+34.636.82.24634Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.4 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+29.539.810.24037Energy Technologies 5.4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+27.333.86.55732Energy Infrastructure 10.1 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+15.628.312.75443Export Capability & Sophistication 10 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+2.610.07.457107Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 11 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+2.510.98.44760Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 7.4 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+1.011.810.955148Technical & Vocational Skills 10 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−2.07.09.047112Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.4 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−3.723.026.73451Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.7 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−12.823.035.747145Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.4 · Foundational