Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Russia and Eurasia · GEO

Georgia

Baseline index 7.54Rank 72 of 197FoundationalRussia and EurasiaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Insulated over 10 years: lower vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years15.1rank 115 of 197 · 3 years: 15.3
Worst case−9.3%Infrastructure collapse · tail −9.2%
Opportunity · 10 years−2.9rank 102 of 197 · 3 years: −2.2
Best case+18Energy abundance · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed32%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.84expected index points from best practice
Breadth12 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid campaign, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Georgia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.67−0.70−0.96−0.42025Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.3 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.66−0.70−1.02−0.45024Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.72−0.67−0.92−0.40▼ 324Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.68−0.64−0.91−0.41▼ 121Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.70−0.61−0.83−0.36▼ 221Maritime Power 1.5 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.59−0.57−0.88−0.38▼ 117Economic Output & Productivity 5.8 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06High 0.71−0.55−0.79−0.34▼ 519Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.1 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.53−0.48−0.77−0.34019Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 5.2 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.47−0.47−0.66−0.29▼ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.53−0.38−0.52−0.23013Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.56−0.35−0.57−0.25▲ 114Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.6 · Foundational
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.48−0.31−0.52−0.23▲ 112Energy Infrastructure 6.3 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.28−0.24−0.37−0.16▲ 29Resource Infrastructure 6 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.36−0.20−0.32−0.1407Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 8.3 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.87−1.02−0.36−0.36−0.36−0.91−0.85−0.83−0.73
Pandemic−0.75−0.37−0.31−0.91−0.79−0.85−0.79−0.78−0.78
Energy supply shock−0.16−0.94−0.35−0.39−0.39−0.88−1.04−1.00−0.89
AI diffusion shock−0.78−0.35−0.32−0.94−0.70−0.97−0.82−0.45−0.40
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.00−0.84·−0.45−0.96−0.38−0.77−0.98
Global financial crisis−0.29−0.29−0.26−0.58−0.58−0.72−0.96−0.82−0.66
Hybrid campaign−0.41−0.90−0.97·−1.00−0.93·−0.37−0.37
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.40−0.23−0.56−0.50−0.69−0.84−0.50−0.58
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.59−0.25−0.23·−0.59−0.57−0.59−0.57−0.86
Single-supplier cut-off−0.70−0.20−0.25−0.31·−0.63·−0.64−0.64
Legitimacy crisis−0.26·−0.52−0.26−0.60−0.84−0.69··
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.65−0.19−0.48−0.22−0.54−0.29−0.22−0.22
Food and water shock−0.03−0.27−0.12−0.34−0.32−0.34−0.16−0.27−0.31
Mass displacement·−0.20−0.15−0.40−0.33−0.46−0.19−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Georgia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+18.020.22.22558Energy Technologies 2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.09.32.35358Health System Capability 10 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+6.917.210.43870Export Capability & Sophistication 6.7 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+6.617.210.641103Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+5.214.08.841119Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+4.519.615.130109Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−5.413.118.431109Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−14.118.933.031149Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−17.25.522.730174Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−22.29.631.821118Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception