Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · EST

Estonia

Baseline index 11.49Rank 33 of 197TransitionalEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years9.1rank 158 of 197 · 3 years: 9.6
Worst case−6.3%Pandemic · tail −5.3%
Opportunity · 10 years+14.4rank 32 of 197 · 3 years: +15.3
Best case+40100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed47%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.40expected index points from best practice
Breadth11 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Hybrid campaign, AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: land border with russia or belarus; share of population aged 65 and over; few months of imports covered by reserves; internet users as a share of population; refugees hosted per head of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Estonia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.88−0.72−1.36−0.60▼ 114Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.73−0.58−1.06−0.46010Sensing, Timing & Navigation 3.4 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.84−0.54−1.15−0.47▲ 110Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.66−0.53−0.93−0.41013Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.4 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.70−0.53−1.05−0.46012Economic Output & Productivity 8.9 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06High 0.89−0.52−0.98−0.43▼ 18Air Power 3.1 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.59−0.48−0.76−0.33012Energy Technologies 3.7 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.74−0.44−0.75−0.33▲ 18Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.2 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.58−0.43−0.69−0.30012Maritime Power 4.9 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.44−0.31−0.63−0.2707Energy Infrastructure 8.2 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.53−0.24−0.54−0.2207Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.3 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.57−0.22−0.50−0.21▼ 17Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 11.4 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.42−0.20−0.46−0.1907Energy Infrastructure 8.3 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.19−0.13−0.25−0.11▲ 16Resource Infrastructure 6.5 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.77−0.39−0.32−0.93−0.82−0.88−0.82−0.80−0.80
Infrastructure collapse−0.72−0.84−0.30−0.30−0.30−0.75−0.70−0.68−0.60
AI diffusion shock−0.71−0.29−0.26−0.78−0.59−0.81−0.69−0.38−0.34
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.67−0.28−0.25·−0.65−0.63−0.65−0.64−0.96
Global financial crisis−0.27−0.27−0.24−0.53−0.53−0.66−0.88−0.76−0.61
Hybrid campaign−0.39−0.84−0.91·−0.93−0.88·−0.35−0.35
Energy supply shock−0.11−0.67−0.25−0.28−0.28−0.62−0.74−0.71−0.63
Single-supplier cut-off−0.85−0.23−0.29−0.36·−0.74·−0.75−0.75
Chokepoint closure−0.05−0.71−0.60·−0.32−0.68−0.27−0.55−0.70
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.26−0.15−0.36−0.32−0.45−0.54−0.32−0.37
Legitimacy crisis−0.17·−0.35−0.17−0.41−0.57−0.46··
Mass displacement·−0.23−0.17−0.46−0.38−0.52−0.22−0.03·
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.42−0.13−0.31−0.14−0.35−0.19−0.14−0.14
Food and water shock−0.01−0.14−0.06−0.17−0.17−0.18−0.08−0.14−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Estonia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+40.441.81.45128Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.4 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+23.032.59.45522Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 10 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+20.924.53.64153Energy Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+20.523.12.65448Energy Infrastructure 8.9 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+11.825.714.03729Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+10.715.44.76420Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 10.8 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+5.825.920.15255Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.4 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+4.312.78.455125Energy Infrastructure 8.9 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+2.87.64.773102Health System Capability 14 · Established
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed0.07.07.05098Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.4 · Foundational