Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Gulf and Middle East · EGY

Egypt

Baseline index 8.98Rank 57 of 197FoundationalGulf and Middle EastAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years9.8rank 151 of 197 · 3 years: 9.0
Worst case−7.6%Food and water shock · tail −6.8%
Opportunity · 10 years+5.3rank 63 of 197 · 3 years: +2.6
Best case+30Middle East settlement · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed35%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.58expected index points from best practice
Breadth10 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: land borders with states in conflict or collapse; adult obesity rate; consumer price inflation; public debt relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; staple foods among the top five imports; industry as a share of gdp; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Egypt’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Food and water shock S11High 0.87−0.68−1.15−0.50▼ 620Population Health 7.1 · Foundational
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.58−0.59−0.83−0.36▼ 419Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4.4 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.59−0.56−0.82−0.36016Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.3 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.70−0.55−0.72−0.31▼ 419Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 3.4 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.58−0.55−0.84−0.37▲ 214Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.1 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.51−0.51−0.76−0.33017Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4.6 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.90−0.49−0.79−0.35▼ 417Political Institutions & Civic Participation 4 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10High 0.64−0.44−0.70−0.31▼ 314National Resilience & Crisis Management 8.4 · Foundational
Pandemic S14Medium 0.40−0.40−0.62−0.27▲ 214Labour & Employment 6.5 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.45−0.31−0.50−0.22012Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.8 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.43−0.29−0.51−0.22010Economic Leverage & Dependence 7.6 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.42−0.26−0.43−0.1909Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.7 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.24−0.22−0.34−0.1508Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.25−0.21−0.32−0.14▲ 18Energy Technologies 4.7 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Food and water shock−0.08−0.78−0.35−0.95−0.91−0.97−0.45−0.78−0.89
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.49−0.28−0.69−0.62−0.85−1.03−0.62−0.71
AI diffusion shock−0.74−0.31−0.28−0.82−0.61−0.85−0.72−0.40−0.35
Legitimacy crisis−0.40·−0.80−0.40−0.94−1.30−1.07··
Infrastructure collapse−0.68−0.80−0.28−0.28−0.28−0.71−0.66−0.65−0.57
Global financial crisis−0.26−0.26−0.23−0.52−0.52−0.64−0.86−0.74−0.59
Mass displacement·−0.50−0.38−1.02−0.84−1.15−0.49−0.06·
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.90−0.27−0.67−0.30−0.75−0.40−0.30−0.30
Pandemic−0.43−0.22−0.18−0.52−0.46−0.49−0.46−0.45−0.45
Hybrid campaign−0.23−0.50−0.54·−0.55−0.52·−0.21−0.21
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.47−0.40·−0.21−0.46−0.18−0.36−0.47
Single-supplier cut-off−0.51−0.14−0.17−0.22·−0.44·−0.44−0.44
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.28−0.12−0.10·−0.27−0.26−0.27−0.27−0.40
Energy supply shock−0.05−0.29−0.11−0.12−0.12−0.27−0.32−0.31−0.28

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Egypt is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+29.839.49.75325Internal Security & Order 10 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+25.528.32.8454Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 7.7 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+15.726.811.14740Technical & Vocational Skills 8.5 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+12.717.65.04477Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8.2 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+10.626.816.24237Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 7.7 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+3.48.65.23495Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+1.911.59.64698Export Capability & Sophistication 8 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−1.518.620.13485Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 5 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−5.29.114.337146Energy Technologies 5.2 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−11.115.526.62768Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception