Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · DNK

Denmark

Baseline index 13.94Rank 18 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years5.5rank 181 of 197 · 3 years: 5.8
Worst case−4.3%Infrastructure collapse · tail −4.0%
Opportunity · 10 years+24.1rank 15 of 197 · 3 years: +25.1
Best case+58100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed55%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.18expected index points from best practice
Breadth12 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Hybrid campaign, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: internet users as a share of population; urban share of population; share of population aged 65 and over; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Denmark’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.82−0.61−1.18−0.50018Sensing, Timing & Navigation 8.9 · Foundational
Pandemic S14High 0.90−0.59−1.40−0.56014Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.9 · Transitional
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.86−0.48−1.18−0.44▲ 112Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.1 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.70−0.47−0.98−0.43▲ 113Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.2 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03High 0.70−0.43−1.04−0.42013Economic Output & Productivity 13.6 · Established
Energy supply shock S09High 0.60−0.41−0.78−0.32▲ 114Energy Technologies 8.4 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.77−0.38−0.78−0.33012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.56−0.36−0.67−0.28▲ 113Resource Infrastructure 8.8 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.55−0.31−0.61−0.26010Maritime Power 9.2 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.46−0.18−0.50−0.18▲ 19Energy Infrastructure 10 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.30−0.17−0.43−0.1707Energy Infrastructure 10.1 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.43−0.17−0.43−0.1605Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11.5 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.53−0.17−0.47−0.1705Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 14.9 · Established
Food and water shock S11Low 0.31−0.16−0.41−0.1609Resource Infrastructure 9.4 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.76−0.88−0.31−0.31−0.31−0.79−0.73−0.72−0.63
Pandemic−0.62−0.31−0.26−0.76−0.66−0.71−0.66−0.65−0.65
AI diffusion shock−0.62−0.26−0.23−0.69−0.52−0.72−0.61−0.33−0.30
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.59−0.25−0.22·−0.58−0.56−0.58−0.57−0.85
Global financial crisis−0.22−0.22−0.20−0.44−0.44−0.55−0.73−0.62−0.50
Energy supply shock−0.10−0.57−0.21−0.24−0.24−0.54−0.63−0.61−0.54
Single-supplier cut-off−0.74−0.20−0.26−0.32·−0.64·−0.65−0.65
Chokepoint closure−0.05−0.59−0.50·−0.26−0.57−0.23−0.45−0.58
Hybrid campaign−0.23−0.50−0.55·−0.56−0.52·−0.21−0.21
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.38−0.11−0.28−0.13−0.31−0.17−0.13−0.13
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.15−0.08−0.20−0.18−0.25−0.30−0.18−0.21
Legitimacy crisis−0.13·−0.25−0.13−0.29−0.41−0.34··
Mass displacement·−0.18−0.13−0.36−0.29−0.40−0.17−0.02·
Food and water shock−0.02−0.19−0.08−0.23−0.22−0.23−0.11−0.19−0.21

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Denmark is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+57.558.61.1709Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12 · Established
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+38.845.16.47111Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 13.3 · Established
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+32.835.22.45931Energy Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+27.034.67.74820Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5.2 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+25.427.11.76436Energy Infrastructure 10.5 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+23.232.99.8799Biotechnology & Health Technologies 15 · Advanced
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+9.712.73.06927Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 11.8 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+5.512.97.465116Energy Infrastructure 10.5 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+1.66.14.47786Transport Infrastructure 14.9 · Established
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed−1.91.33.283162Financial Regulation & Integrity 16 · Advanced