Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · BEL

Belgium

Baseline index 13.46Rank 21 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years7.2rank 170 of 197 · 3 years: 7.3
Worst case−5.0%Pandemic · tail −4.7%
Opportunity · 10 years+26.4rank 12 of 197 · 3 years: +27.1
Best case+58Energy abundance · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed52%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.21expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkResource Infrastructureweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; few months of imports covered by reserves; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; public debt relative to gdp; share of population aged 65 and over; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Belgium’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.95−0.67−1.48−0.63026Information Environment & Strategic Communication 9.7 · Transitional
Energy supply shock S09High 0.92−0.62−1.19−0.52026Resource Infrastructure 7.8 · Foundational
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.84−0.62−1.22−0.53025Sensing, Timing & Navigation 7.7 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03High 0.90−0.59−1.35−0.58024Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 12.8 · Established
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.87−0.57−1.21−0.52024Artificial Intelligence 9.8 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.84−0.56−1.01−0.44024Maritime Power 6.4 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.69−0.47−0.99−0.43016Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 10.3 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.63−0.42−0.91−0.39019Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 12.5 · Established
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.72−0.36−0.73−0.32015Resource Infrastructure 8.7 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.54−0.33−0.61−0.27012Maritime Power 6.9 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.52−0.25−0.54−0.2308Force Generation & Mobilisation 9.3 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.48−0.22−0.52−0.22012Energy Infrastructure 12.9 · Established
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.55−0.20−0.49−0.20011Internal Security & Order 14.3 · Established
Food and water shock S11Low 0.29−0.17−0.39−0.17010Resource Infrastructure 8.9 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.71−0.36−0.32−0.86−0.75−0.81−0.75−0.74−0.74
Energy supply shock−0.14−0.85−0.36−0.36−0.36−0.80−0.95−0.91−0.81
Infrastructure collapse−0.76−0.89−0.35−0.32−0.32−0.80−0.74−0.73−0.64
Global financial crisis−0.30−0.30−0.30−0.59−0.59−0.74−0.99−0.85−0.68
AI diffusion shock−0.74−0.31−0.31−0.82−0.62−0.85−0.72−0.40−0.35
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.91−0.84·−0.41−0.87−0.35−0.70−0.90
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.59−0.25−0.25·−0.58−0.55−0.58−0.56−0.85
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.35−0.22−0.48−0.44−0.60−0.73−0.44−0.50
Single-supplier cut-off−0.70−0.19−0.27−0.30·−0.60·−0.61−0.61
Hybrid campaign−0.24−0.53−0.62·−0.59−0.55·−0.22−0.22
Legitimacy crisis−0.18·−0.40−0.18−0.42−0.59−0.48··
Disaster in the core−0.01−0.45−0.15−0.33−0.15−0.37−0.20−0.15−0.15
Mass displacement·−0.21−0.17−0.42−0.34−0.47−0.20−0.02·
Food and water shock−0.02−0.19−0.10−0.24−0.23−0.24−0.11−0.19−0.22

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Belgium is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+58.264.46.26510Energy Technologies 11.4 · Transitional
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+56.057.41.46511Information Environment & Strategic Communication 11 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+38.142.14.07113Energy Infrastructure 13.5 · Established
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+37.145.07.97212Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 13.8 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+29.244.014.76218Artificial Intelligence 11 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+14.732.918.27426Regulatory Governance & Strategic Controls 14.3 · Established
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+9.314.45.16831Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 12.6 · Established
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+8.316.17.87287Energy Infrastructure 13.5 · Established
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+1.36.75.47190Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 13.3 · Established
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+0.24.74.572139Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 13.5 · Established