Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Europe · AUT

Austria

Baseline index 12.80Rank 23 of 197EstablishedEuropeAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years7.2rank 169 of 197 · 3 years: 7.4
Worst case−4.9%Energy supply shock · tail −4.7%
Opportunity · 10 years+22.9rank 18 of 197 · 3 years: +23.6
Best case+51Energy abundance · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed50%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.30expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkResource Infrastructureweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; internet users as a share of population; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; refugees hosted per head of population; share of population aged 65 and over; few months of imports covered by reserves; public debt relative to gdp; trade in goods and services relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Austria’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.90−0.63−1.15−0.49▼ 125Energy Technologies 6.5 · Foundational
Pandemic S14High 0.81−0.59−1.25−0.53022Information Environment & Strategic Communication 9.2 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.78−0.58−0.90−0.39▼ 123Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.70−0.56−1.01−0.44▲ 120Sensing, Timing & Navigation 6.2 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03High 0.82−0.55−1.22−0.53▼ 117Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 13.1 · Established
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.85−0.54−1.16−0.49▲ 120Artificial Intelligence 8.8 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.65−0.45−0.91−0.40012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 10.2 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.60−0.39−0.86−0.37017Energy Infrastructure 11.1 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.74−0.37−0.75−0.33014Resource Infrastructure 8.7 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.54−0.36−0.58−0.2509Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.50−0.22−0.54−0.22▲ 113Energy Infrastructure 11.3 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.43−0.21−0.44−0.1906Force Generation & Mobilisation 9.4 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.57−0.20−0.50−0.2009Foundational Education 14.6 · Established
Food and water shock S11Low 0.19−0.11−0.25−0.10010Resource Infrastructure 9 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.15−0.88−0.32−0.37−0.37−0.83−0.98−0.95−0.84
Pandemic−0.63−0.32−0.25−0.77−0.67−0.72−0.67−0.66−0.66
Chokepoint closure−0.08−0.98−0.70·−0.44−0.94−0.38−0.76−0.97
Infrastructure collapse−0.70−0.82−0.29−0.29−0.29−0.73−0.68−0.67−0.58
Global financial crisis−0.28−0.28−0.25−0.55−0.55−0.69−0.92−0.79−0.63
AI diffusion shock−0.70−0.29−0.26−0.78−0.59−0.80−0.68−0.38−0.33
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.57−0.24−0.21·−0.55−0.53−0.55−0.54−0.81
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.33−0.18−0.46−0.41−0.56−0.68−0.41−0.47
Single-supplier cut-off−0.72−0.19−0.25−0.31·−0.63·−0.64−0.64
Hybrid campaign−0.27−0.60−0.57·−0.66−0.62·−0.25−0.25
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.45−0.14−0.34−0.15−0.38−0.20−0.15−0.15
Legitimacy crisis−0.15·−0.30−0.15−0.35−0.49−0.41··
Mass displacement·−0.21−0.16−0.42−0.35−0.48−0.20−0.02·
Food and water shock−0.01−0.13−0.06−0.16−0.15−0.16−0.08−0.13−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Austria is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+51.351.40.15415Energy Technologies 8 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+45.246.71.56221Information Environment & Strategic Communication 10.3 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+33.140.77.56916Trade Facilitation & Logistics 13 · Established
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+33.033.70.75820Alliances & Security Cooperation 10 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+30.141.811.75916Artificial Intelligence 10 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+13.229.015.87030Biotechnology & Health Technologies 12.8 · Established
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+5.710.75.06247Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 10.4 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+2.611.48.766139Energy Infrastructure 11.9 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+0.95.95.06493Agriculture & Food Infrastructure 11.3 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed0.04.34.274145Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 14.3 · Established