Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · ZWE

Zimbabwe

Baseline index 4.33Rank 135 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years30.6rank 53 of 197 · 3 years: 31.3
Worst case−25.2%Sovereign funding crisis · tail −22.2%
Opportunity · 10 years−0.9rank 88 of 197 · 3 years: −3.0
Best case+17Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed17%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.23expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Legitimacy crisis, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: no coastline; consumer price inflation; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; few months of imports covered by reserves; share of population aged under 15; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head; remittances relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Zimbabwe’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.88−1.09−1.25−0.56▼ 621Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.96−1.02−1.22−0.54▼ 619Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.74−0.78−0.97−0.42▼ 515Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 3.2 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.59−0.77−0.88−0.39▲ 119Financial Stability & Crisis Management 2.1 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.85−0.69−0.85−0.38▼ 113Monetary & Currency Capability 0.9 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.58−0.69−0.81−0.36▲ 414Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.67−0.65−0.77−0.34▼ 111Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.46−0.58−0.70−0.31▲ 512Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.5 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.52−0.57−0.69−0.31▲ 112Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.70−0.55−0.66−0.30011Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.54−0.46−0.59−0.26▲ 110Energy Infrastructure 3.6 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.32−0.37−0.44−0.20▲ 46Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.42−0.29−0.37−0.1609Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 3.8 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.18−0.16−0.19−0.09▲ 14Maritime Power 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Sovereign funding crisis−0.11−0.92−0.48−1.27−1.15−1.58−1.86−1.15−1.31
Energy supply shock−0.18−1.45−0.51−0.60−0.60−1.36−1.61−1.55−1.38
Food and water shock−0.09−0.89−0.38−1.08−1.03−1.11−0.52−0.89−1.01
Global financial crisis−0.37−0.39−0.33−0.77−0.77−0.97−1.29−1.11−0.88
Legitimacy crisis−0.49·−0.95−0.52−1.20−1.68−1.38··
Infrastructure collapse−0.75−1.03−0.35−0.37−0.37−0.92−0.85−0.84−0.73
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.10−0.79·−0.49−1.06−0.42−0.85−1.09
Pandemic−0.59−0.31−0.25−0.76−0.66−0.71−0.66−0.65−0.65
AI diffusion shock−0.65−0.32−0.28−0.85−0.63−0.87−0.74−0.41−0.36
Single-supplier cut-off−0.91−0.30−0.37−0.47·−0.96·−0.98−0.98
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.96−0.28−0.71−0.32−0.80−0.43−0.32−0.32
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.44−0.20−0.18·−0.47−0.45−0.47−0.46−0.69
Mass displacement·−0.30−0.22−0.61−0.50−0.69−0.29−0.04·
Hybrid campaign−0.12−0.27−0.27·−0.30−0.28·−0.11−0.11

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Zimbabwe is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+16.721.75.02637Investment Attraction & Projection 4.7 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+13.915.11.21777Energy Technologies 1.8 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+13.717.53.82419Fiscal Capacity & Public Finance 4.3 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+10.714.63.91928Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+7.413.35.92594Alliances & Security Cooperation 4.5 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+5.116.111.02060Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+0.17.57.423111Export Capability & Sophistication 4 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−3.17.610.819159Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−7.015.122.117123Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−28.14.933.012154Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception