Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · URY

Uruguay

Baseline index 8.54Rank 63 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years11.7rank 137 of 197 · 3 years: 11.0
Worst case−11.2%Infrastructure collapse · tail −9.5%
Opportunity · 10 years+5.7rank 62 of 197 · 3 years: +8.0
Best case+26Energy abundance · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed36%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.63expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; youth unemployment rate; adult obesity rate.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Uruguay’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.96−0.96−1.35−0.60▼ 126Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.78−0.78−1.21−0.53021Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.5 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09High 0.80−0.71−1.03−0.45▼ 320Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.71−0.61−0.96−0.42019Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.63−0.56−0.94−0.41018Economic Output & Productivity 7.9 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.60−0.51−0.71−0.31016Maritime Power 3 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.52−0.43−0.74−0.33017Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 6.7 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.78−0.43−0.79−0.35▼ 18Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.7 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.42−0.39−0.59−0.26▲ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.67−0.39−0.73−0.32015Energy Infrastructure 8.1 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.37−0.26−0.37−0.17▲ 110Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.50−0.24−0.45−0.1909Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 10.6 · Transitional
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.26−0.21−0.28−0.1209Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.5 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Low 0.23−0.18−0.31−0.14▲ 110Resource Infrastructure 4.1 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.15−1.40−0.50−0.50−0.50−1.25−1.17−1.14−1.00
Pandemic−0.82−0.41−0.34−1.00−0.88−0.94−0.88−0.86−0.86
Energy supply shock−0.16−0.99−0.37−0.41−0.41−0.93−1.10−1.06−0.94
AI diffusion shock−0.74−0.34−0.30−0.89−0.67−0.92−0.78−0.43−0.38
Global financial crisis−0.28−0.28−0.25−0.56−0.56−0.70−0.93−0.80−0.64
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.84−0.71·−0.38−0.81−0.32−0.65−0.83
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.36−0.20−0.50−0.45−0.62−0.75−0.45−0.52
Legitimacy crisis−0.31·−0.63−0.31−0.73−1.02−0.84··
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.49−0.21−0.19·−0.49−0.47−0.49−0.48−0.72
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.80−0.24−0.59−0.27−0.67−0.36−0.27−0.27
Single-supplier cut-off−0.49−0.14−0.17−0.21·−0.43·−0.44−0.44
Mass displacement·−0.24−0.18−0.49−0.40−0.56−0.24−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.34−0.37·−0.38−0.35·−0.14−0.14
Food and water shock−0.02−0.20−0.09−0.25−0.24−0.25−0.12−0.20−0.23

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Uruguay is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+26.327.31.03141Energy Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+21.426.04.63858Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+13.821.07.24948Investment Attraction & Projection 9 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+13.818.44.64466Alliances & Security Cooperation 7.5 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+7.916.58.63534Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+5.17.01.86180Financial Regulation & Integrity 11.5 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+4.818.013.24380Export Capability & Sophistication 8 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−2.820.022.84098Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−9.713.222.92464Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−20.29.729.938189Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5 · Nascent