Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · TUN

Tunisia

Baseline index 7.71Rank 71 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years15.7rank 111 of 197 · 3 years: 15.5
Worst case−11.0%Infrastructure collapse · tail −10.2%
Opportunity · 10 years+7.9rank 51 of 197 · 3 years: +7.2
Best case+20Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed31%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.89expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock. Highest exposure indicators: youth unemployment rate; little renewable water per head; adult obesity rate; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Tunisia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.81−0.85−1.17−0.51▲ 124Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.6 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.72−0.77−1.12−0.49018Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.5 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03High 0.68−0.73−1.02−0.45▼ 119Financial Stability & Crisis Management 5.9 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09High 0.76−0.71−0.98−0.43▼ 320Energy Technologies 1.5 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.67−0.70−0.97−0.42▼ 319Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.9 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.86−0.61−0.87−0.38▼ 114Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.9 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.64−0.60−0.88−0.39▲ 113Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.9 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.79−0.54−0.86−0.38▼ 217Energy Infrastructure 5.6 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.61−0.52−0.72−0.32017Maritime Power 3.9 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.58−0.48−0.76−0.33▼ 114Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6.9 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.68−0.46−0.68−0.30019Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.38−0.38−0.53−0.23▲ 113Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.4 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.61−0.34−0.54−0.2409Political Institutions & Civic Participation 6.8 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.28−0.22−0.31−0.1307Sensing, Timing & Navigation 2.1 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.06−1.24−0.44−0.44−0.44−1.11−1.03−1.01−0.89
Pandemic−0.82−0.41−0.34−1.00−0.87−0.93−0.87−0.85−0.85
Global financial crisis−0.37−0.37−0.33−0.74−0.74−0.92−1.23−1.05−0.84
Energy supply shock−0.17−0.99−0.37−0.41−0.41−0.93−1.10−1.06−0.94
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.59−0.33−0.81−0.73−1.01−1.22−0.73−0.84
Legitimacy crisis−0.45·−0.89−0.45−1.04−1.45−1.19··
AI diffusion shock−0.79−0.33−0.30−0.88−0.66−0.90−0.77−0.42−0.38
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.12−0.34−0.83−0.37−0.93−0.50−0.37−0.37
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.85−0.72·−0.38−0.81−0.33−0.65−0.84
Food and water shock−0.05−0.55−0.25−0.67−0.64−0.68−0.32−0.55−0.62
Single-supplier cut-off−0.89−0.24−0.31−0.38·−0.77·−0.78−0.78
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.48−0.20−0.18·−0.47−0.45−0.47−0.46−0.68
Mass displacement·−0.35−0.26−0.71−0.58−0.80−0.34−0.04·
Hybrid campaign−0.17−0.36−0.39·−0.40−0.38·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Tunisia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+19.626.87.14225Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+16.824.88.03865Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+16.619.42.83913Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+13.115.92.84221Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7.5 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+10.420.09.64078Energy Infrastructure 7.1 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+9.820.310.52990Energy Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+9.614.95.34259Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 8 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+6.923.816.93341Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+3.226.923.73969Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−18.112.530.62589Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception