Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · TON

Tonga

Baseline index 3.21Rank 165 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Small and exposed. Small states with narrow economies and few buffers. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years38.8rank 32 of 197 · 3 years: 39.5
Worst case−30.4%Energy supply shock · tail −27.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−10.1rank 158 of 197 · 3 years: −9.2
Best case+5Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed14%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.19expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; remittances relative to gdp; adult obesity rate; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Tonga’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.97−1.08−0.50▼ 522Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.94−0.88−0.99−0.47▼ 814Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.68−0.82−0.96−0.43▼ 121Economic Output & Productivity 0.3 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.67−0.72−0.81−0.36▼ 611Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.60−0.71−0.83−0.37▼ 118Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.68−0.70−0.80−0.36▼ 316Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.61−0.65−0.78−0.35▼ 120Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.75−0.62−0.79−0.35▼ 318Energy Infrastructure 1 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.47−0.53−0.59−0.27▲ 113Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.40−0.47−0.56−0.25▲ 59Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1.6 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.63−0.45−0.50−0.23012Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.49−0.36−0.46−0.20▲ 36Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0.8 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.33−0.29−0.33−0.14▼ 36Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.17−0.22−0.10▲ 35Labour & Employment 4.1 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.26−0.42−0.61−0.61−1.37−1.62−1.47−1.37
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.40−0.86·−0.72−1.55−0.62−1.20−1.57
Global financial crisis−0.14−0.43−0.30−0.87−0.87−1.08−1.45−1.24−0.99
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.15−0.44−0.31·−1.03−0.99−1.03−1.01−1.51
Pandemic−0.15−0.42−0.27−1.03−0.90−0.96−0.90−0.88−0.88
AI diffusion shock−0.15−0.44−0.31−1.17−0.88−1.21−1.03−0.57−0.50
Food and water shock−0.04−0.70−0.26−0.92−0.88−0.94−0.44−0.75−0.86
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.28−0.30−0.96−0.43−1.08−0.58−0.43−0.43
Infrastructure collapse−0.15−0.87−0.25−0.31−0.31−0.78−0.73−0.71−0.62
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.40−0.17−0.55−0.50−0.68−0.83−0.50−0.57
Single-supplier cut-off−0.15−0.29−0.29−0.47·−0.95·−0.96−0.96
Legitimacy crisis−0.11·−0.46−0.29−0.67−0.94−0.77··
Hybrid campaign−0.09−0.52−0.44·−0.58−0.55·−0.22−0.22
Mass displacement·−0.18−0.10−0.36−0.30−0.41−0.17−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Tonga is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+5.011.16.016120Investment Attraction & Projection 2 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+2.56.23.711124Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+0.94.63.724127Financial Regulation & Integrity 4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−0.810.911.718145Energy Infrastructure 2.8 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−6.07.813.812114Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−10.28.718.99155Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−10.56.116.710147Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−23.67.731.313179Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−23.96.630.512188Export Capability & Sophistication 2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−26.65.031.68146Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception