Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · TZA

Tanzania

Baseline index 5.82Rank 102 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years16.6rank 109 of 197 · 3 years: 17.2
Worst case−12.8%Energy supply shock · tail −11.8%
Opportunity · 10 years+3.8rank 71 of 197 · 3 years: +2.4
Best case+24Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed25%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.80expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Legitimacy crisis, Single-supplier cut-off. Highest exposure indicators: share of population aged under 15; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Tanzania’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.76−0.74−0.97−0.43▲ 115Energy Technologies 0.3 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.65−0.68−0.94−0.41▼ 416Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.57−0.64−0.80−0.36▲ 418Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.67−0.63−0.89−0.39▼ 614Population Health 4.9 · Nascent
Pandemic S14Medium 0.46−0.54−0.70−0.31▲ 314Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.3 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.67−0.50−0.68−0.30▼ 28Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.9 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10High 0.62−0.49−0.68−0.30▼ 216Energy Infrastructure 4.8 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.65−0.48−0.63−0.28▼ 114Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.44−0.48−0.66−0.29▲ 310Labour & Employment 5 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.52−0.47−0.62−0.27▲ 211Maritime Power 2.6 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.65−0.41−0.57−0.25▼ 611Health System Capability 5.6 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.38−0.41−0.51−0.23▲ 610Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.24−0.26−0.34−0.15▲ 56Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.21−0.19−0.24−0.10▲ 28Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.9 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.17−1.04−0.39−0.43−0.43−0.97−1.15−1.11−0.99
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.56−0.32−0.78−0.71−0.97−1.18−0.71−0.81
Infrastructure collapse−0.74−0.95−0.34−0.34−0.34−0.84−0.79−0.77−0.68
Food and water shock−0.07−0.72−0.32−0.88−0.84−0.90−0.42−0.72−0.82
Pandemic−0.55−0.29−0.24−0.70−0.61−0.66−0.61−0.60−0.60
Legitimacy crisis−0.35·−0.73−0.37−0.85−1.19−0.97··
Disaster in the core−0.03−1.01−0.30−0.74−0.34−0.84−0.45−0.34−0.34
Single-supplier cut-off−0.80−0.26−0.33−0.41·−0.82·−0.84−0.84
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.22−0.48−0.48−0.60−0.80−0.69−0.55
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.77−0.65·−0.35−0.74−0.30−0.59−0.76
Mass displacement·−0.42−0.31−0.85−0.70−0.96−0.41−0.05·
AI diffusion shock−0.48−0.23−0.20−0.60−0.45−0.62−0.53−0.29−0.26
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.32−0.14−0.12·−0.32−0.31−0.32−0.31−0.47
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.30−0.33·−0.34−0.32·−0.13−0.13

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Tanzania is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+23.928.44.5348Energy Infrastructure 6.1 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+15.518.63.03712Health System Capability 7 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+14.417.73.32618Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+10.618.07.42538Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+3.816.713.035117Energy Infrastructure 6.1 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+1.98.06.23199Export Capability & Sophistication 5.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+0.619.418.82173Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.8 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−0.49.59.924149Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−2.013.916.021140Energy Technologies 2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−10.25.515.81566Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception