Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · TWN

Taiwan

Baseline index 14.05Rank 17 of 197EstablishedIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years6.5rank 172 of 197 · 3 years: 6.8
Worst case−4.8%Energy supply shock · tail −4.6%
Opportunity · 10 years+30.3rank 10 of 197 · 3 years: +30.5
Best case+61Energy abundance · gainer in 9 of 10
Shock absorbed53%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.20expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkDiplomatic Statecraft & Global Networksweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; little renewable water per head; internet users as a share of population; share of exports going to china and the united states; share of population aged 65 and over; urban share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Taiwan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 1.00−0.67−1.30−0.56▼ 122Resource Infrastructure 8.4 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.87−0.63−1.24−0.53▼ 220Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.7 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.96−0.63−1.15−0.50▼ 119Alliances & Security Cooperation 7.7 · Foundational
Pandemic S14High 0.86−0.61−1.35−0.57022Biotechnology & Health Technologies 12 · Established
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.95−0.58−1.31−0.54▼ 118Artificial Intelligence 11.1 · Transitional
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.76−0.49−1.10−0.47021Sensing, Timing & Navigation 11.8 · Transitional
Global financial crisis S03High 0.71−0.47−1.06−0.45013Labour & Employment 12.6 · Established
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.92−0.42−0.94−0.38014Resource Infrastructure 9.4 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10High 0.86−0.39−0.94−0.39▼ 115Energy Infrastructure 12.4 · Established
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.38−0.25−0.55−0.2408Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 12.5 · Established
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.43−0.25−0.57−0.2408Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 6.4 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.38−0.21−0.42−0.1807Alliances & Security Cooperation 7.9 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.38−0.18−0.40−0.1706Information Environment & Strategic Communication 12.8 · Established
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.09−0.23−0.0905Labour & Employment 13.4 · Established

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.16−0.93−0.39−0.39−0.39−0.87−1.03−1.00−0.89
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.80−0.34−0.34·−0.78−0.75−0.78−0.77−1.15
Chokepoint closure−0.08−1.02−0.94·−0.46−0.98−0.39−0.78−1.01
Pandemic−0.64−0.32−0.29−0.78−0.68−0.73−0.68−0.67−0.67
AI diffusion shock−0.75−0.31−0.31−0.84−0.63−0.86−0.73−0.40−0.36
Infrastructure collapse−0.61−0.71−0.28−0.26−0.26−0.64−0.60−0.58−0.51
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.24−0.47−0.47−0.59−0.79−0.68−0.54
Single-supplier cut-off−0.80−0.21−0.31−0.34·−0.69·−0.70−0.70
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.79−0.26−0.59−0.26−0.66−0.35−0.26−0.26
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.21−0.13−0.29−0.26−0.36−0.43−0.26−0.30
Food and water shock−0.03−0.28−0.14−0.34−0.33−0.35−0.16−0.28−0.32
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.34−0.40·−0.38−0.36·−0.14−0.14
Legitimacy crisis−0.13·−0.28−0.13−0.30−0.42−0.35··
Mass displacement·−0.10−0.08−0.19−0.16−0.22−0.09−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Taiwan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+61.361.50.2647Energy Technologies 10.4 · Transitional
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+55.456.61.27013Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+51.662.510.9695Artificial Intelligence 12.3 · Established
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+29.329.90.65026Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+22.727.14.47213Energy Infrastructure 13.5 · Established
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+22.227.45.2763Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 14.8 · Established
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+13.517.94.37123Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 · Established
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+13.230.717.57129Biotechnology & Health Technologies 13.2 · Established
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+13.238.525.35350Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 7 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+5.97.01.17570Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 14.5 · Established