Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · SSD

South Sudan

Baseline index 1.38Rank 197 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Acute fragility. Every scenario is severe; there is little capability left to lose. One of 13 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years100.0rank 1 of 197 · 3 years: 100.0
Worst case−75.1%Sovereign funding crisis · tail −66.0%
Opportunity · 10 years−21.4rank 196 of 197 · 3 years: −23.0
Best case+7Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed5%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.29expected index points from best practice
Breadth0 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, Global financial crisis, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; no coastline; low real gdp per head; few months of imports covered by reserves; consumer price inflation; low life expectancy at birth; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in South Sudan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.95−1.03−1.05−0.5804Energy Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.88−0.94−0.96−0.5303Political Institutions & Civic Participation 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.82−0.75−0.78−0.4303Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.99−0.74−0.78−0.3803Foundational Education 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.62−0.74−0.79−0.35▲ 33Trade Facilitation & Logistics 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.56−0.70−0.74−0.3402Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.68−0.67−0.72−0.3202Energy Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.91−0.65−0.67−0.3703Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.92−0.56−0.59−0.3103Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.45−0.52−0.55−0.2502Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.43−0.48−0.50−0.2302Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.38−0.44−0.47−0.21▲ 33Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.40−0.42−0.45−0.20▲ 34Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.23−0.22−0.23−0.1002Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.96−0.51−1.42−1.29−1.60−1.30−1.03−1.17
Global financial crisis−0.04−0.62−0.47−1.20−1.22−1.47−1.24−1.04−1.12
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.04−0.57−0.44·−1.32−1.12−1.16−0.97−1.17
Mass displacement·−0.80−0.51−1.55−1.29−1.60−0.79−0.10·
Food and water shock−0.02−0.87−0.34−1.06−1.01−1.08−0.50−0.80−0.96
Pandemic−0.04−0.44−0.31−1.06−0.88−0.99−0.93−0.78−0.90
Disaster in the core−0.02−1.34−0.36−1.05−0.47−1.18−0.63−0.47−0.47
Legitimacy crisis−0.04·−0.96−0.64−1.24−1.68−1.29··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.04−0.45−0.48−0.71·−1.21·−1.01−1.12
Infrastructure collapse−0.04−0.88−0.29−0.32−0.32−0.80−0.70−0.71−0.64
AI diffusion shock−0.04−0.31−0.25−0.80−0.62−0.82−0.73−0.40−0.36
Energy supply shock−0.02−0.63−0.21−0.26−0.26−0.60−0.71−0.68−0.60
Chokepoint closure−0.02−0.71−0.47·−0.32−0.69−0.28−0.54−0.70
Hybrid campaign−0.03−0.39−0.36·−0.43−0.41·−0.16−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what South Sudan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.56.80.38103Industrial & Sectoral Base 1.3 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+1.86.44.67121Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 1 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−0.63.54.1491Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−1.92.84.74111Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−4.44.69.06134Export Capability & Sophistication 1 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Loser−11.32.113.44195Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−23.54.127.64193Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−43.30.944.13191Artificial Intelligence 0 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Loser−49.93.153.09196Trade Facilitation & Logistics 1.5 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−84.00.884.84197Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception