Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · SLB

Solomon Islands

Baseline index 2.91Rank 174 of 197InceptionIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Small and exposed. Small states with narrow economies and few buffers. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years41.0rank 27 of 197 · 3 years: 42.5
Worst case−34.4%Energy supply shock · tail −31.0%
Opportunity · 10 years−7.7rank 140 of 197 · 3 years: −7.2
Best case+10Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed13%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.16expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of exports going to china and the united states; low real gdp per head; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Solomon Islands’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.93−1.00−1.11−0.50▼ 320Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.91−0.86−0.95−0.45▼ 512Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.80−0.85−0.95−0.43▼ 512Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.80−0.68−0.85−0.37▼ 415Energy Infrastructure 0.6 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.55−0.66−0.76−0.34▲ 213Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.55−0.65−0.77−0.34▲ 214Economic Output & Productivity 1.1 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.62−0.65−0.73−0.33015Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.43−0.49−0.54−0.24▲ 411Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.63−0.46−0.51−0.23011Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Low 0.34−0.40−0.48−0.21▲ 79Energy Infrastructure 1.7 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.50−0.37−0.46−0.20▲ 73Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.5 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Low 0.27−0.29−0.35−0.15▲ 99Resource Infrastructure 1.1 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.30−0.27−0.30−0.13▼ 14Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.18−0.22−0.10▲ 53Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.32−0.42−0.62−0.62−1.39−1.64−1.58−1.39
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.41−0.71·−0.70−1.50−0.60−1.20−1.53
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.13−0.51−0.37·−1.22−1.19−1.23−1.21−1.79
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.39−0.34−1.07−0.48−1.21−0.64−0.48−0.48
Pandemic−0.13−0.39−0.25−0.95−0.84−0.89−0.84−0.82−0.82
Global financial crisis−0.12−0.34−0.24−0.69−0.69−0.86−1.15−0.98−0.79
AI diffusion shock−0.13−0.41−0.29−1.11−0.83−1.14−0.97−0.53−0.47
Infrastructure collapse−0.13−0.79−0.23−0.29−0.29−0.72−0.68−0.66−0.58
Single-supplier cut-off−0.13−0.30−0.30−0.47·−0.96·−0.97−0.97
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.34−0.15−0.47−0.42−0.58−0.70−0.42−0.48
Legitimacy crisis−0.11·−0.47−0.30−0.70−0.97−0.80··
Food and water shock−0.03−0.33−0.12−0.41−0.39−0.42−0.19−0.33−0.38
Hybrid campaign−0.08−0.48−0.41·−0.54−0.51·−0.20−0.20
Mass displacement·−0.19−0.11−0.38−0.31−0.43−0.18−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Solomon Islands is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+10.312.32.01677Energy Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+8.210.22.01790Energy Infrastructure 2.5 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+7.18.00.88108Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.94.83.910138Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+0.24.03.824142Financial Regulation & Integrity 4.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−6.77.814.510121Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−12.34.316.69159Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−19.35.925.211168Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−22.29.031.213186Export Capability & Sophistication 2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−26.33.930.36143Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception