Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · SYC

Seychelles

Baseline index 5.27Rank 113 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years24.0rank 76 of 197 · 3 years: 24.2
Worst case−17.7%Energy supply shock · tail −16.9%
Opportunity · 10 years−0.4rank 87 of 197 · 3 years: −1.5
Best case+12Energy abundance · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed24%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.06expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Seychelles’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.93−1.13−0.51▼ 526Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.85−0.88−1.22−0.54▼ 222Investment Attraction & Projection 3.2 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.82−0.87−1.04−0.47▼ 126Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.79−0.85−1.11−0.50022Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.85−0.81−0.95−0.44▼ 322Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.68−0.67−0.97−0.43▼ 220Energy Infrastructure 2.6 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.70−0.65−0.86−0.39020Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.57−0.58−0.72−0.32▼ 120Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.68−0.48−0.57−0.26▼ 115Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.64−0.44−0.70−0.31▼ 215Energy Infrastructure 2.8 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.62−0.41−0.59−0.26▼ 113Information Environment & Strategic Communication 1.1 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.44−0.41−0.57−0.25▼ 111Resource Infrastructure 0.3 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.43−0.24−0.38−0.17▲ 17Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 8 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.25−0.22−0.26−0.1206Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.25−0.48−0.56−0.56−1.26−1.50−1.44−1.28
Global financial crisis−0.20−0.46−0.40−0.91−0.91−1.14−1.52−1.30−1.04
Infrastructure collapse−0.29−1.41−0.49−0.50−0.50−1.26−1.18−1.15−1.01
Pandemic−0.29−0.49−0.39−1.20−1.05−1.12−1.05−1.03−1.03
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.30−0.98·−0.62−1.34−0.54−1.07−1.38
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.56−0.31−0.78−0.70−0.96−1.16−0.70−0.80
AI diffusion shock−0.29−0.40−0.35−1.06−0.80−1.09−0.93−0.51−0.45
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.26−0.34−0.30·−0.79−0.76−0.79−0.77−1.16
Single-supplier cut-off−0.29−0.30−0.38−0.48·−0.96·−0.98−0.98
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.92−0.28−0.68−0.31−0.77−0.41−0.31−0.31
Legitimacy crisis−0.15·−0.60−0.31−0.73−1.02−0.84··
Food and water shock−0.04−0.46−0.21−0.57−0.54−0.58−0.27−0.46−0.53
Mass displacement·−0.25−0.18−0.50−0.41−0.56−0.24−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.08−0.38−0.41·−0.42−0.40·−0.16−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Seychelles is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+11.912.81.01483Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+9.814.34.52781Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.310.02.74455Financial Regulation & Integrity 7.8 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.213.97.728106Energy Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+5.611.96.22476Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 4.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+4.913.89.019106Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+4.37.73.41962Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−4.311.615.920102Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−9.313.923.222124Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−18.87.125.91390Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception