Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · SEN

Senegal

Baseline index 6.42Rank 91 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years17.6rank 104 of 197 · 3 years: 17.7
Worst case−13.3%Energy supply shock · tail −12.6%
Opportunity · 10 years+7.5rank 53 of 197 · 3 years: +5.6
Best case+24Yield revolution · gainer in 4 of 10
Shock absorbed27%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.90expected index points from best practice
Breadth12 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Global financial crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of population aged under 15; staple foods among the top five imports; share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; remittances relative to gdp; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Senegal’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.87−0.85−1.12−0.49▼ 326Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.87−0.79−1.14−0.50▼ 729Population Health 4.5 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.71−0.78−0.99−0.44▼ 128Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.72−0.73−1.04−0.45▼ 327Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.1 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03High 0.60−0.63−0.90−0.39▼ 125Labour & Employment 4.7 · Nascent
Pandemic S14Medium 0.55−0.63−0.85−0.37▲ 125Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.4 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.68−0.59−0.80−0.35023Maritime Power 3.3 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.56−0.59−0.75−0.33023Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.69−0.51−0.67−0.30▼ 120Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.57−0.43−0.62−0.27▼ 216Energy Infrastructure 4.9 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.62−0.42−0.63−0.28▼ 113Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.1 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.36−0.37−0.50−0.22▲ 216Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.60−0.37−0.53−0.23018Labour & Employment 5.7 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.26−0.22−0.29−0.13▲ 112Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.7 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.20−1.19−0.45−0.50−0.50−1.12−1.33−1.28−1.14
Food and water shock−0.09−0.89−0.40−1.09−1.04−1.12−0.52−0.89−1.02
Infrastructure collapse−0.86−1.16−0.42−0.42−0.42−1.04−0.97−0.95−0.83
Sovereign funding crisis−0.08−0.60−0.34−0.84−0.76−1.04−1.26−0.76−0.86
Global financial crisis−0.31−0.32−0.29−0.64−0.64−0.80−1.06−0.91−0.73
Pandemic−0.64−0.34−0.27−0.81−0.71−0.76−0.71−0.70−0.70
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.97−0.82·−0.43−0.93−0.37−0.74−0.96
AI diffusion shock−0.68−0.33−0.29−0.87−0.65−0.90−0.76−0.42−0.37
Single-supplier cut-off−0.87−0.27−0.35−0.43·−0.87·−0.89−0.89
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.89−0.27−0.66−0.30−0.74−0.39−0.30−0.30
Legitimacy crisis−0.31·−0.62−0.31−0.73−1.01−0.83··
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.45−0.20−0.18·−0.46−0.44−0.46−0.45−0.68
Mass displacement·−0.37−0.28−0.76−0.62−0.85−0.36−0.04·
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.36−0.38·−0.39−0.37·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Senegal is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+23.827.03.2306Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.6 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+23.228.15.03410Technical & Vocational Skills 6 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+19.622.42.8422Health System Capability 8 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+14.521.77.12927Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.6 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+9.620.410.73783Energy Infrastructure 6.1 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+6.111.85.63573Export Capability & Sophistication 6 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+5.818.212.322113Energy Technologies 2.2 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+5.214.29.029104Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.6 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+3.620.717.22356Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−12.37.619.91771Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.7 · Inception