Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · WSM

Samoa

Baseline index 3.48Rank 160 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Small and exposed. Small states with narrow economies and few buffers. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years34.4rank 39 of 197 · 3 years: 34.5
Worst case−27.5%Energy supply shock · tail −25.2%
Opportunity · 10 years−9.6rank 155 of 197 · 3 years: −8.7
Best case+7Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed16%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.12expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; remittances relative to gdp; adult obesity rate; staple foods among the top five imports.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Samoa’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.91−0.95−1.09−0.49▼ 422Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.91−0.84−0.95−0.44▼ 419Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.71−0.83−1.00−0.44▼ 322Investment Attraction & Projection 0.6 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.76−0.77−0.89−0.40▼ 420Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.69−0.71−0.87−0.39021Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.56−0.65−0.77−0.34018Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.59−0.61−0.71−0.32▼ 116Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.45−0.51−0.63−0.28▲ 418Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 2.1 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.45−0.49−0.56−0.25▲ 613Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.56−0.45−0.59−0.26▼ 113Energy Infrastructure 2.2 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.57−0.41−0.46−0.21▲ 114Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.52−0.36−0.47−0.21▲ 57Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.2 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.33−0.28−0.32−0.14▼ 26Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.26−0.17−0.22−0.10▲ 35Labour & Employment 4.6 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.20−0.36−0.59−0.59−1.34−1.58−1.53−1.36
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.33−0.67·−0.70−1.50−0.60−1.20−1.54
Global financial crisis−0.14−0.43−0.27−0.88−0.88−1.11−1.47−1.26−1.01
AI diffusion shock−0.15−0.48−0.30−1.32−0.99−1.36−1.15−0.63−0.56
Food and water shock−0.04−0.77−0.25−1.03−0.99−1.06−0.49−0.84−0.97
Pandemic−0.15−0.39−0.21−0.94−0.82−0.88−0.82−0.81−0.81
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.15−0.37−0.23·−0.88−0.85−0.88−0.86−1.29
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.43−0.16−0.60−0.54−0.75−0.90−0.54−0.62
Infrastructure collapse−0.15−0.79−0.20−0.29−0.29−0.73−0.68−0.67−0.58
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.93−0.19−0.71−0.32−0.80−0.43−0.32−0.32
Single-supplier cut-off−0.15−0.27−0.23−0.42·−0.85·−0.87−0.87
Legitimacy crisis−0.11·−0.41−0.29−0.68−0.95−0.78··
Hybrid campaign−0.08−0.51−0.39·−0.58−0.54·−0.22−0.22
Mass displacement·−0.18−0.09−0.36−0.29−0.40−0.17−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Samoa is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.911.95.01897Investment Attraction & Projection 2.3 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+2.76.33.628104Financial Regulation & Integrity 4.8 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+2.15.83.612125Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+1.512.811.221129Energy Infrastructure 3.5 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−4.78.413.113104Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−8.79.618.210152Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−8.77.316.011140Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−21.28.830.013171Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−22.16.929.115184Export Capability & Sophistication 2.3 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−35.15.540.68175Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception