Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · LCA

Saint Lucia

Baseline index 3.85Rank 149 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Small and exposed. Small states with narrow economies and few buffers. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years31.2rank 49 of 197 · 3 years: 30.2
Worst case−24.0%Global financial crisis · tail −22.2%
Opportunity · 10 years−13.3rank 177 of 197 · 3 years: −12.2
Best case+4Sovereign debt reset · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed17%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.10expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; services as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Saint Lucia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Global financial crisis S03High 0.83−0.92−1.15−0.51▼ 619Economic Output & Productivity 1 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.79−0.83−0.95−0.43021Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.72−0.80−1.01−0.45▼ 221Energy Infrastructure 1.4 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.66−0.76−0.91−0.41021Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.64−0.69−0.79−0.36▲ 217Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.71−0.69−0.83−0.37▼ 118Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.71−0.67−0.76−0.35017Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.55−0.58−0.67−0.30019Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.53−0.54−0.68−0.30▲ 315Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.68−0.47−0.61−0.28▲ 210Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.1 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.56−0.44−0.60−0.26▲ 39Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.46−0.33−0.37−0.17▲ 611Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.32−0.21−0.28−0.12▲ 27Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 5.4 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.23−0.20−0.23−0.10▲ 27Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Global financial crisis−0.16−0.48−0.32−0.98−0.98−1.23−1.64−1.40−1.12
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.08−0.33−0.51−0.51−1.15−1.36−1.32−1.17
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.67−0.28−0.95−0.85−1.18−1.42−0.85−0.98
Pandemic−0.17−0.44−0.27−1.09−0.96−1.03−0.96−0.94−0.94
Infrastructure collapse−0.17−1.12−0.32−0.42−0.42−1.04−0.97−0.95−0.83
AI diffusion shock−0.17−0.43−0.29−1.17−0.88−1.20−1.02−0.56−0.50
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.09−0.57·−0.54−1.16−0.47−0.93−1.20
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.17−0.35−0.24·−0.82−0.79−0.82−0.80−1.20
Food and water shock−0.04−0.63−0.21−0.77−0.74−0.79−0.37−0.63−0.72
Legitimacy crisis−0.15·−0.52−0.38−0.89−1.24−1.02··
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.91−0.21−0.70−0.31−0.78−0.42−0.31−0.31
Single-supplier cut-off−0.17−0.21−0.21−0.33·−0.68·−0.69−0.69
Mass displacement·−0.22−0.13−0.44−0.36−0.50−0.21−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.06−0.37−0.30·−0.41−0.38·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Saint Lucia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+4.27.53.43286Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 6 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+2.29.27.021142Energy Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.67.67.113143Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−7.68.716.421164Energy Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−8.97.216.115142Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−9.09.518.411153Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−13.28.521.817172Export Capability & Sophistication 3 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−17.85.523.413175Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−33.06.439.415193Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−37.74.842.510184Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception