Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · KNA

Saint Kitts & Nevis

Baseline index 3.83Rank 150 of 197NascentLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Small and exposed. Small states with narrow economies and few buffers. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years32.2rank 46 of 197 · 3 years: 31.9
Worst case−22.9%Global financial crisis · tail −21.9%
Opportunity · 10 years−11.1rank 163 of 197 · 3 years: −10.3
Best case+8Energy abundance · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed17%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.13expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; little renewable water per head; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Saint Kitts & Nevis’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Global financial crisis S03High 0.78−0.88−1.10−0.49▼ 416Economic Output & Productivity 1.1 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.82−0.87−0.99−0.45020Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.67−0.78−0.93−0.42▼ 219Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.69−0.75−0.85−0.39▼ 115Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.62−0.70−0.88−0.39▲ 318Energy Infrastructure 1.8 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.70−0.67−0.75−0.35▼ 115Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.67−0.66−0.79−0.36▲ 114Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.58−0.61−0.72−0.32▼ 216Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.54−0.56−0.70−0.31▲ 214Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.74−0.51−0.66−0.30▲ 19Force Generation & Mobilisation 0.3 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.59−0.47−0.62−0.28▲ 27Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.55−0.40−0.45−0.20▲ 210Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.35−0.22−0.30−0.13▲ 26Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 5.2 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.23−0.21−0.23−0.10▲ 15Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Global financial crisis−0.17−0.46−0.30−0.93−0.93−1.16−1.55−1.33−1.06
Energy supply shock−0.06−1.13−0.34−0.53−0.53−1.20−1.42−1.37−1.22
Pandemic−0.19−0.46−0.28−1.12−0.98−1.05−0.98−0.96−0.96
Infrastructure collapse−0.19−1.22−0.34−0.45−0.45−1.12−1.05−1.03−0.90
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.59−0.25−0.83−0.74−1.02−1.24−0.74−0.85
Chokepoint closure−0.06−1.10−0.57·−0.54−1.16−0.46−0.93−1.19
AI diffusion shock−0.19−0.42−0.27−1.11−0.83−1.14−0.97−0.53−0.48
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.19−0.37−0.25·−0.87−0.84−0.87−0.85−1.28
Food and water shock−0.06−0.65−0.22−0.80−0.76−0.82−0.38−0.65−0.75
Legitimacy crisis−0.16·−0.56−0.42−0.97−1.35−1.11··
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.97−0.22−0.73−0.33−0.82−0.44−0.33−0.33
Single-supplier cut-off−0.19−0.25−0.24−0.40·−0.82·−0.83−0.83
Mass displacement·−0.23−0.14−0.47−0.39−0.53−0.23−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.06−0.37−0.30·−0.41−0.39·−0.16−0.16

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Saint Kitts & Nevis is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+8.49.91.51196Energy Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+1.78.97.221127Energy Infrastructure 3.3 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+1.54.93.430124Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 5.5 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+0.67.67.113144Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−4.59.414.022177Energy Infrastructure 3.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed−9.76.916.615151Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.6 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Loser−13.18.621.816170Export Capability & Sophistication 2.7 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−19.04.623.513182Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−28.37.535.715190Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−30.24.935.010164Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception