Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · PHL

Philippines

Baseline index 8.83Rank 61 of 197FoundationalIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years11.4rank 139 of 197 · 3 years: 11.5
Worst case−8.5%AI diffusion shock · tail −7.8%
Opportunity · 10 years+10.8rank 43 of 197 · 3 years: +11.4
Best case+27Energy abundance · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed36%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.64expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Energy supply shock, Geoeconomic confrontation. Highest exposure indicators: earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; internet users as a share of population; remittances relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Philippines’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.80−0.75−1.11−0.48023Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.5 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.80−0.69−1.03−0.45017Energy Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.63−0.63−0.91−0.40▲ 114Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.9 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.87−0.58−0.95−0.41019Energy Infrastructure 7.3 · Foundational
Pandemic S14Medium 0.57−0.58−0.89−0.39▲ 319Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.9 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.63−0.57−0.89−0.39▲ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.73−0.54−0.87−0.38016Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 6.5 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.56−0.50−0.84−0.37▲ 220Labour & Employment 7.7 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.70−0.45−0.70−0.31012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.8 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.40−0.36−0.58−0.25▲ 210Internal Security & Order 7.6 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.50−0.34−0.51−0.22▲ 111Internal Security & Order 7.3 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.37−0.29−0.48−0.21▲ 19Population Health 7.3 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.37−0.26−0.40−0.18▲ 212Sensing, Timing & Navigation 2.8 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.20−0.11−0.17−0.08▲ 45Internal Security & Order 8 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
AI diffusion shock−0.99−0.41−0.37−1.09−0.82−1.13−0.96−0.53−0.47
Energy supply shock−0.16−0.96−0.36−0.40−0.40−0.90−1.06−1.03−0.91
Infrastructure collapse−0.78−0.91−0.33−0.33−0.33−0.81−0.76−0.74−0.65
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.20−0.36−0.89−0.40−1.00−0.53−0.40−0.40
Pandemic−0.62−0.31−0.25−0.75−0.66−0.70−0.66−0.64−0.64
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.73−0.30−0.27·−0.71−0.69−0.71−0.70−1.05
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.89−0.75·−0.40−0.85−0.34−0.68−0.88
Global financial crisis−0.25−0.25−0.23−0.50−0.50−0.63−0.84−0.72−0.58
Single-supplier cut-off−0.86−0.23−0.30−0.37·−0.74·−0.76−0.76
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.30−0.17−0.42−0.37−0.51−0.62−0.37−0.43
Legitimacy crisis−0.25·−0.49−0.25−0.58−0.80−0.66··
Food and water shock−0.03−0.34−0.15−0.41−0.39−0.42−0.20−0.34−0.38
Hybrid campaign−0.19−0.42−0.46·−0.47−0.44·−0.18−0.18
Mass displacement·−0.11−0.08−0.22−0.18−0.25−0.11−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Philippines is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+26.627.10.53540Energy Technologies 4.8 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+23.031.98.94811Energy Infrastructure 8.9 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+22.724.01.24643Internal Security & Order 8.3 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+16.619.12.53766Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+11.221.610.43519Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+7.226.719.54967Export Capability & Sophistication 9.3 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+6.68.82.24859Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 9 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+4.422.017.63764Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+3.813.910.13866Biotechnology & Health Technologies 6 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−8.523.031.53159Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.2 · Nascent