Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · PER

Peru

Baseline index 8.61Rank 62 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years9.7rank 152 of 197 · 3 years: 9.2
Worst case−10.4%Infrastructure collapse · tail −8.5%
Opportunity · 10 years+3.6rank 72 of 197 · 3 years: +4.6
Best case+16100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed36%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.53expected index points from best practice
Breadth10 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; share of exports going to china and the united states; internet users as a share of population; urban share of population; industry as a share of gdp; low life expectancy at birth; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Peru’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.87−0.89−1.25−0.55▼ 132Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.9 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.68−0.71−1.06−0.46024Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.2 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.63−0.60−0.86−0.38021Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.88−0.58−0.96−0.42▼ 226Energy Infrastructure 7.8 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.51−0.46−0.72−0.32▼ 116Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.50−0.43−0.75−0.33014Labour & Employment 7.4 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.63−0.41−0.64−0.28▼ 115Information Environment & Strategic Communication 5.8 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.57−0.36−0.57−0.25▼ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.1 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.41−0.36−0.60−0.26013Internal Security & Order 7.9 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.36−0.30−0.46−0.20▲ 414Energy Technologies 3.1 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.53−0.28−0.47−0.2108Internal Security & Order 7.7 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.25−0.20−0.34−0.15▲ 19Internal Security & Order 8.2 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.19−0.27−0.1208Sensing, Timing & Navigation 2.5 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.23−0.17−0.27−0.12▲ 48Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 6.7 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−1.11−1.30−0.46−0.46−0.46−1.16−1.08−1.06−0.93
Pandemic−0.75−0.38−0.31−0.91−0.80−0.85−0.80−0.78−0.78
AI diffusion shock−0.78−0.33−0.30−0.88−0.66−0.91−0.77−0.42−0.38
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.20−0.36−0.89−0.40−1.00−0.53−0.40−0.40
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.58−0.24−0.22·−0.57−0.55−0.57−0.55−0.83
Global financial crisis−0.22−0.22−0.19−0.43−0.43−0.54−0.72−0.62−0.49
Legitimacy crisis−0.30·−0.61−0.30−0.71−0.99−0.81··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.70−0.19−0.24−0.30·−0.60·−0.61−0.61
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.30−0.17−0.41−0.37−0.51−0.62−0.37−0.42
Energy supply shock−0.07−0.42−0.16−0.17−0.17−0.39−0.46−0.45−0.40
Mass displacement·−0.29−0.22−0.59−0.48−0.66−0.28−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.02−0.22−0.10−0.27−0.26−0.28−0.13−0.22−0.25
Hybrid campaign−0.14−0.30−0.33·−0.34−0.32·−0.13−0.13
Chokepoint closure−0.02−0.28−0.24·−0.12−0.27−0.11−0.21−0.27

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Peru is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+15.921.15.23667Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.6 · Nascent
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+15.827.611.84939Investment Attraction & Projection 9.3 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+10.024.414.54856Export Capability & Sophistication 9 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+6.218.812.73144Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+4.46.42.05185Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 9.5 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+2.923.921.03772Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.6 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−2.412.615.038116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.6 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−8.07.915.846166Internal Security & Order 8.7 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−10.211.621.82265Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.2 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−11.79.621.332157Energy Technologies 3.8 · Nascent