Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · PAN

Panama

Baseline index 7.17Rank 80 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years14.9rank 118 of 197 · 3 years: 14.7
Worst case−12.0%Infrastructure collapse · tail −11.3%
Opportunity · 10 years+0.1rank 82 of 197 · 3 years: +0.9
Best case+13Energy abundance · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed30%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.78expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Panama’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.83−0.86−1.15−0.52014Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.84−0.79−1.07−0.47▼ 211Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.72−0.77−1.09−0.49014Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.7 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.69−0.65−0.91−0.4109Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.61−0.61−0.91−0.40▲ 19Economic Output & Productivity 6.8 · Foundational
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.59−0.58−0.86−0.37▲ 27Monetary & Currency Capability 5.5 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.65−0.57−0.76−0.34▼ 211Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 1 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.52−0.48−0.71−0.32▲ 18Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.68−0.46−0.69−0.30▲ 110Force Generation & Mobilisation 3 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.57−0.40−0.55−0.25▲ 15Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.49−0.32−0.53−0.23▲ 17Energy Infrastructure 7.2 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.44−0.24−0.39−0.17▲ 12Internal Security & Order 8.5 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.27−0.21−0.35−0.15▲ 43Resource Infrastructure 4.8 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.20−0.26−0.11▲ 24Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.7 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.88−1.29−0.46−0.46−0.46−1.15−1.07−1.05−0.92
Energy supply shock−0.14−1.12−0.42−0.46−0.46−1.05−1.24−1.20−1.06
Pandemic−0.74−0.42−0.34−1.01−0.88−0.95−0.88−0.86−0.86
AI diffusion shock−0.72−0.37−0.33−0.98−0.73−1.01−0.86−0.47−0.42
Global financial crisis−0.31−0.31−0.28−0.62−0.62−0.77−1.03−0.88−0.70
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.49−0.27−0.68−0.61−0.84−1.01−0.61−0.70
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.94−0.79·−0.42−0.91−0.36−0.73−0.93
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.55−0.26−0.23·−0.61−0.58−0.61−0.59−0.89
Legitimacy crisis−0.34·−0.68−0.34−0.79−1.10−0.91··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.68−0.21−0.27−0.34·−0.68·−0.69−0.69
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.67−0.20−0.50−0.22−0.56−0.30−0.22−0.22
Mass displacement·−0.24−0.18−0.49−0.40−0.55−0.24−0.03·
Food and water shock−0.02−0.24−0.11−0.29−0.28−0.30−0.14−0.24−0.27
Hybrid campaign−0.15−0.33−0.36·−0.37−0.34·−0.14−0.14

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Panama is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+12.520.98.42480Energy Technologies 1.4 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+12.517.95.42878Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+8.317.49.14289Alliances & Security Cooperation 6.5 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+6.522.315.74571Export Capability & Sophistication 7.7 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+6.021.915.946110Technical & Vocational Skills 8 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+4.06.52.54788Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 8.5 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+0.513.513.02774Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−9.47.316.830144Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−11.313.825.130133Biotechnology & Health Technologies 3.2 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−19.210.029.11994Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception