Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

South Asia · PAK

Pakistan

Baseline index 7.96Rank 69 of 197FoundationalSouth AsiaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years13.2rank 127 of 197 · 3 years: 12.2
Worst case−10.6%Sovereign funding crisis · tail −9.0%
Opportunity · 10 years+7.4rank 54 of 197 · 3 years: +6.5
Best case+28Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed30%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.78expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Legitimacy crisis, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: consumer price inflation; remittances relative to gdp; little renewable water per head; share of population aged under 15; low real gdp per head.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Pakistan’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.78−0.84−1.13−0.49▼ 225Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.5 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11High 0.74−0.67−0.98−0.43▼ 222Population Health 3.8 · Nascent
Energy supply shock S09High 0.72−0.64−0.93−0.41019Energy Technologies 4.5 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.58−0.61−0.81−0.35018Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.8 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.78−0.57−0.80−0.35▼ 115Justice System & Fundamental Rights 5.1 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.56−0.55−0.82−0.36▲ 218Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4.7 · Nascent
Pandemic S14Medium 0.49−0.54−0.76−0.33▲ 218Population Health 4.3 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10High 0.65−0.51−0.71−0.31016Health System Capability 5.6 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.44−0.48−0.66−0.29▲ 116Labour & Employment 4.8 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.65−0.48−0.78−0.34▲ 114Economic Leverage & Dependence 5.5 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08High 0.69−0.43−0.61−0.27010Foundational Education 4.8 · Nascent
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.31−0.31−0.44−0.19▲ 212Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.5 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.37−0.26−0.38−0.16▲ 211Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.4 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.33−0.23−0.37−0.16▲ 210Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.9 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Sovereign funding crisis−0.09−0.70−0.43−0.97−0.87−1.20−1.45−0.87−0.99
Food and water shock−0.08−0.76−0.38−0.92−0.88−0.95−0.44−0.76−0.86
Energy supply shock−0.15−0.88−0.37−0.37−0.37−0.83−0.98−0.95−0.84
AI diffusion shock−0.80−0.33−0.33−0.89−0.67−0.92−0.78−0.43−0.38
Legitimacy crisis−0.42·−0.91−0.42−0.97−1.35−1.11··
Infrastructure collapse−0.68−0.79−0.31−0.28−0.28−0.71−0.66−0.65−0.57
Pandemic−0.57−0.28−0.26−0.69−0.60−0.65−0.60−0.59−0.59
Disaster in the core−0.03−1.04−0.35−0.77−0.35−0.86−0.46−0.35−0.35
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.24−0.48−0.48−0.60−0.81−0.69−0.55
Chokepoint closure−0.06−0.78−0.72·−0.35−0.75−0.30−0.60−0.77
Mass displacement·−0.44−0.37−0.89−0.73−1.00−0.43−0.05·
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.40−0.17−0.17·−0.39−0.37−0.39−0.38−0.57
Single-supplier cut-off−0.49−0.13−0.19−0.21·−0.43·−0.44−0.44
Hybrid campaign−0.17−0.37−0.43·−0.41−0.38·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Pakistan is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+27.530.63.1364Foundational Education 6.3 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+22.325.53.2378Technology Adoption & Diffusion 6.5 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+18.224.76.54156Internal Security & Order 7 · Foundational
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+17.827.09.13659Energy Technologies 6 · Foundational
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+16.819.83.1368Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 7 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+7.713.66.03299Population Health 5.3 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+7.326.319.03438Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 5.8 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+5.722.216.63256Population Health 5.3 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−7.310.317.636153Investment Attraction & Projection 6.3 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−25.99.935.823140Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.2 · Inception