Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · NZL

New Zealand

Baseline index 12.83Rank 22 of 197EstablishedIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years6.0rank 177 of 197 · 3 years: 5.9
Worst case−4.9%Infrastructure collapse · tail −4.5%
Opportunity · 10 years+21.4rank 21 of 197 · 3 years: +22.3
Best case+42100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 8 of 10
Shock absorbed52%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.21expected index points from best practice
Breadth4 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: internet users as a share of population; adult obesity rate; urban share of population; share of population aged 65 and over.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in New Zealand’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.80−0.62−1.16−0.50▼ 120Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.9 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.86−0.57−1.18−0.50▼ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.4 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.76−0.55−1.17−0.49023Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.1 · Transitional
Energy supply shock S09High 0.69−0.49−0.89−0.37017Energy Technologies 4.7 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.66−0.43−0.78−0.34017Maritime Power 7.7 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.58−0.41−0.82−0.35014Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.8 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.60−0.39−0.89−0.38018Economic Output & Productivity 11.7 · Transitional
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.52−0.32−0.75−0.31013Energy Infrastructure 10.2 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10High 0.72−0.32−0.79−0.32▼ 18Energy Infrastructure 10 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.56−0.30−0.57−0.24011Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1.8 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.38−0.21−0.42−0.18010Air Power 5.7 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.51−0.21−0.52−0.20013Force Generation & Mobilisation 9.1 · Transitional
Food and water shock S11Low 0.23−0.13−0.30−0.1306Resource Infrastructure 9.7 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Low 0.30−0.11−0.26−0.1107Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 13.2 · Established

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.78−0.91−0.32−0.32−0.32−0.81−0.75−0.74−0.65
AI diffusion shock−0.74−0.31−0.28−0.82−0.62−0.85−0.72−0.40−0.35
Pandemic−0.59−0.29−0.24−0.71−0.62−0.67−0.62−0.61−0.61
Energy supply shock−0.11−0.69−0.26−0.29−0.29−0.65−0.77−0.74−0.66
Chokepoint closure−0.05−0.70−0.60·−0.32−0.68−0.27−0.54−0.70
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.52−0.22−0.20·−0.51−0.49−0.51−0.50−0.75
Global financial crisis−0.20−0.20−0.18−0.40−0.40−0.49−0.66−0.57−0.45
Sovereign funding crisis−0.03−0.27−0.15−0.37−0.33−0.46−0.56−0.33−0.38
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.65−0.20−0.48−0.22−0.54−0.29−0.22−0.22
Single-supplier cut-off−0.59−0.16−0.20−0.25·−0.51·−0.52−0.52
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.35−0.37·−0.38−0.36·−0.14−0.14
Legitimacy crisis−0.15·−0.31−0.15−0.36−0.50−0.41··
Food and water shock−0.01−0.15−0.07−0.18−0.17−0.19−0.09−0.15−0.17
Mass displacement·−0.11−0.08−0.22−0.18−0.25−0.10−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what New Zealand is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+41.943.11.36224Biotechnology & Health Technologies 10.2 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+31.431.70.34632Energy Technologies 5.8 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+29.229.90.76327Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+21.832.610.86527Export Capability & Sophistication 12.3 · Established
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+19.627.17.56224Energy Infrastructure 10.9 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+18.822.23.4598Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 8.6 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+17.831.213.56319Biotechnology & Health Technologies 10.2 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+17.629.912.33925Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.7 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+6.37.21.07965Financial Regulation & Integrity 15.3 · Advanced
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+6.312.96.66150Biotechnology & Health Technologies 10.2 · Transitional