Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · NAM

Namibia

Baseline index 5.95Rank 97 of 197NascentAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years20.8rank 91 of 197 · 3 years: 22.1
Worst case−15.8%Energy supply shock · tail −14.1%
Opportunity · 10 years+4.6rank 67 of 197 · 3 years: +3.8
Best case+15Energy abundance · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed26%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.98expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Legitimacy crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; youth unemployment rate; low life expectancy at birth; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; share of population aged under 15.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Namibia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.97−0.94−1.24−0.55▼ 519Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.73−0.83−1.01−0.46▼ 415Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.81−0.76−0.96−0.42▼ 517Maritime Power 0.8 · Inception
Pandemic S14High 0.66−0.75−0.99−0.44▼ 517Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.5 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.62−0.62−0.91−0.40▼ 315Economic Output & Productivity 4.2 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.83−0.60−0.77−0.35▼ 510Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.59−0.60−0.78−0.35▼ 217Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.88−0.58−0.87−0.39▼ 510Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.55−0.56−0.73−0.33▼ 412Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.52−0.51−0.75−0.33▼ 315Energy Infrastructure 4.6 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.44−0.39−0.58−0.25▼ 38Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 5.6 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.48−0.35−0.53−0.23▼ 25Energy Infrastructure 4.7 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.44−0.26−0.39−0.17▼ 22Labour & Employment 6.8 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.22−0.19−0.24−0.10▼ 14Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.9 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.22−1.31−0.49−0.55−0.55−1.23−1.46−1.41−1.25
Infrastructure collapse−0.80−1.25−0.45−0.45−0.45−1.11−1.04−1.02−0.89
Chokepoint closure−0.10−1.24−1.05·−0.56−1.19−0.48−0.96−1.23
Pandemic−0.67−0.41−0.33−0.99−0.86−0.93−0.86−0.85−0.85
Global financial crisis−0.29−0.31−0.28−0.63−0.63−0.79−1.05−0.90−0.72
Single-supplier cut-off−0.84−0.33−0.43−0.53·−1.07·−1.09−1.09
AI diffusion shock−0.62−0.34−0.31−0.91−0.68−0.94−0.79−0.44−0.39
Legitimacy crisis−0.38·−0.86−0.43−1.00−1.40−1.15··
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.55−0.31−0.28·−0.72−0.70−0.72−0.71−1.06
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.42−0.24−0.59−0.53−0.73−0.88−0.53−0.61
Food and water shock−0.04−0.44−0.20−0.54−0.52−0.56−0.26−0.44−0.51
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.73−0.22−0.54−0.24−0.61−0.32−0.24−0.24
Mass displacement·−0.26−0.20−0.54−0.44−0.61−0.26−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.15−0.32−0.34·−0.35−0.33·−0.13−0.13

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Namibia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+14.719.95.22275Energy Technologies 2.4 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+14.624.39.73345Energy Infrastructure 5.6 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+11.213.82.74327Health System Capability 8 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+10.617.36.73276Alliances & Security Cooperation 5.5 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+10.218.78.52339Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+8.812.13.32336Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+8.614.66.03063Export Capability & Sophistication 5.3 · Nascent
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+3.212.59.321117Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+2.418.015.62361Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−22.46.729.114121Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception