Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · MNG

Mongolia

Baseline index 5.74Rank 105 of 197NascentIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years22.4rank 80 of 197 · 3 years: 23.8
Worst case−16.5%Geoeconomic confrontation · tail −15.3%
Opportunity · 10 years−1.7rank 94 of 197 · 3 years: −0.7
Best case+13100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed24%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.06expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of exports going to china and the united states; land border with russia or belarus; no coastline; industry as a share of gdp; internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Mongolia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.92−0.95−1.21−0.54▼ 715Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.78−0.85−1.14−0.50▼ 413Investment Attraction & Projection 3.6 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.74−0.85−1.11−0.50▼ 412Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.5 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.70−0.77−0.96−0.43▼ 111Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.76−0.74−0.96−0.42▲ 111Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.73−0.72−0.95−0.42▼ 412Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.79−0.70−0.90−0.40▼ 512Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.91−0.64−0.83−0.38▼ 410Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.59−0.62−0.84−0.37▼ 29Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 3.5 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.56−0.41−0.61−0.2704Energy Infrastructure 4.4 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.60−0.40−0.59−0.26▲ 25Information Environment & Strategic Communication 4.1 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Low 0.31−0.30−0.41−0.18▲ 35Trade Facilitation & Logistics 4.8 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.35−0.29−0.37−0.16▼ 25Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.19−0.11−0.17−0.07▲ 42Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 5.8 · Nascent

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.80−0.53−0.43·−1.25−1.20−1.25−1.22−1.83
Global financial crisis−0.39−0.43−0.34−0.86−0.86−1.08−1.44−1.23−0.99
Pandemic−0.78−0.46−0.34−1.12−0.98−1.05−0.98−0.96−0.96
Infrastructure collapse−0.77−1.17−0.38−0.42−0.42−1.05−0.98−0.96−0.84
Energy supply shock−0.16−1.04−0.35−0.43−0.43−0.97−1.16−1.11−0.99
AI diffusion shock−0.76−0.41−0.33−1.10−0.82−1.13−0.96−0.53−0.47
Chokepoint closure−0.09−1.19−0.82·−0.53−1.14−0.46−0.91−1.18
Single-supplier cut-off−0.89−0.36−0.41−0.57·−1.16·−1.18−1.18
Sovereign funding crisis−0.06−0.52−0.26−0.72−0.64−0.89−1.07−0.64−0.74
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.85−0.23−0.63−0.28−0.71−0.38−0.28−0.28
Legitimacy crisis−0.28·−0.54−0.30−0.71−0.98−0.81··
Food and water shock−0.03−0.35−0.14−0.42−0.40−0.43−0.20−0.35−0.39
Hybrid campaign−0.22−0.49−0.45·−0.54−0.51·−0.20−0.20
Mass displacement·−0.11−0.08−0.23−0.19−0.26−0.11−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Mongolia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+12.515.53.02379Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.510.42.94152Financial Regulation & Integrity 7.5 · Foundational
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+5.715.49.632110Energy Infrastructure 5.5 · Nascent
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+1.612.711.12366Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2 · Inception
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed−0.318.318.631156Investment Attraction & Projection 5.3 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed−2.513.115.719141Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−4.320.324.626131Export Capability & Sophistication 4.7 · Nascent
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−5.515.721.124107Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed−7.26.713.921132Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−16.610.827.51584Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.2 · Inception