Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · MEX

Mexico

Baseline index 10.85Rank 36 of 197TransitionalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years7.5rank 168 of 197 · 3 years: 6.9
Worst case−7.2%Infrastructure collapse · tail −6.1%
Opportunity · 10 years+10.6rank 44 of 197 · 3 years: +11.4
Best case+29100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed43%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.37expected index points from best practice
Breadth9 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkInternal Security & Orderweakest point in 4 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of exports going to china and the united states; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; adult obesity rate; urban share of population; internet users as a share of population; industry as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Mexico’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.88−0.78−1.27−0.55▼ 224Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.2 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.73−0.65−1.13−0.50021Labour & Employment 8.5 · Foundational
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.66−0.56−0.90−0.39019Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.8 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10High 0.91−0.55−0.99−0.43▼ 420Health System Capability 9.8 · Transitional
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.65−0.48−0.91−0.40▼ 119Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.61−0.48−0.87−0.38▼ 219Internal Security & Order 8 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03High 0.61−0.47−0.91−0.40015Labour & Employment 8.8 · Foundational
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.64−0.39−0.65−0.28▼ 312Internal Security & Order 7.9 · Foundational
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.61−0.32−0.62−0.27012Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 4.1 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.36−0.25−0.47−0.21▼ 212Internal Security & Order 8.4 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Low 0.31−0.23−0.40−0.18014Energy Technologies 5.9 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.45−0.22−0.40−0.1707Internal Security & Order 8.3 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.17−0.27−0.1208Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.6 · Nascent
Chokepoint closure S05Low 0.23−0.16−0.27−0.1208Maritime Power 7.9 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.97−1.14−0.41−0.41−0.41−1.01−0.95−0.93−0.81
Pandemic−0.70−0.35−0.29−0.84−0.74−0.79−0.74−0.72−0.72
AI diffusion shock−0.73−0.31−0.27−0.81−0.61−0.84−0.71−0.39−0.35
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.13−0.34−0.84−0.38−0.94−0.50−0.38−0.38
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.61−0.25−0.23·−0.59−0.57−0.59−0.58−0.87
Sovereign funding crisis−0.05−0.40−0.23−0.56−0.50−0.69−0.84−0.50−0.58
Global financial crisis−0.24−0.24−0.21−0.48−0.48−0.60−0.79−0.68−0.54
Legitimacy crisis−0.29·−0.57−0.29−0.67−0.93−0.77··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.61−0.16−0.21−0.26·−0.53·−0.54−0.54
Food and water shock−0.03−0.29−0.13−0.35−0.33−0.36−0.17−0.29−0.33
Energy supply shock−0.05−0.32−0.12−0.13−0.13−0.30−0.36−0.34−0.31
Mass displacement·−0.22−0.17−0.46−0.37−0.51−0.22−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.12−0.27−0.29·−0.30−0.28·−0.11−0.11
Chokepoint closure−0.02−0.26−0.22·−0.12−0.25−0.10−0.20−0.26

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Mexico is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+29.433.64.25245Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8 · Transitional
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+22.333.411.15717Technical & Vocational Skills 10.5 · Transitional
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+14.433.318.95228Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+12.524.311.84517Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 7 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+10.940.930.16655Trade Facilitation & Logistics 12.5 · Established
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+8.810.61.85237Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 9.5 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+4.415.611.25460Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.8 · Transitional
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed+1.820.018.23841Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 5 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−7.97.715.652165Internal Security & Order 9 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−10.211.221.445154Energy Technologies 6.4 · Foundational