Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · MYS

Malaysia

Baseline index 11.48Rank 34 of 197TransitionalIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Anchors. Absorb most shocks and take most of the upside. One of 42 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years7.7rank 166 of 197 · 3 years: 7.9
Worst case−6.2%Pandemic · tail −5.8%
Opportunity · 10 years+12.6rank 38 of 197 · 3 years: +13.1
Best case+38100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 5 of 10
Shock absorbed46%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.34expected index points from best practice
Breadth12 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkPolitical Institutions & Civic Participationweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; internet users as a share of population; trade in goods and services relative to gdp; industry as a share of gdp; urban share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Malaysia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Pandemic S14High 0.81−0.72−1.26−0.55▲ 123Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8 · Foundational
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.78−0.67−1.12−0.49019Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.81−0.63−1.11−0.49018Artificial Intelligence 7 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01High 0.83−0.61−1.18−0.51▼ 114Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 7.8 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03High 0.80−0.58−1.20−0.52▼ 113Political Institutions & Civic Participation 9.5 · Transitional
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.91−0.47−0.92−0.40017Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 7.7 · Foundational
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.54−0.41−0.78−0.34012Political Institutions & Civic Participation 9.8 · Transitional
Disaster in the core S10High 0.63−0.36−0.69−0.30013Energy Infrastructure 10 · Transitional
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.52−0.35−0.62−0.27▲ 28Joint Command, Projection & Sustainment 9.1 · Transitional
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.48−0.30−0.49−0.2108Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 8.4 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.39−0.28−0.50−0.22▲ 39Energy Technologies 7 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Medium 0.39−0.26−0.43−0.19▲ 28Sensing, Timing & Navigation 6.1 · Foundational
Food and water shock S11Low 0.28−0.19−0.37−0.1607Population Health 10.9 · Transitional
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.36−0.16−0.32−0.14▲ 26Political Institutions & Civic Participation 10.1 · Transitional

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Pandemic−0.76−0.38−0.31−0.92−0.81−0.87−0.81−0.79−0.79
Infrastructure collapse−0.83−0.97−0.35−0.35−0.35−0.86−0.81−0.79−0.69
AI diffusion shock−0.82−0.34−0.31−0.91−0.68−0.94−0.80−0.44−0.39
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.78−0.33−0.29·−0.76−0.73−0.76−0.74−1.11
Global financial crisis−0.29−0.29−0.26−0.59−0.59−0.73−0.98−0.84−0.67
Single-supplier cut-off−0.91−0.25−0.32−0.39·−0.79·−0.80−0.80
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.34−0.19−0.48−0.43−0.59−0.71−0.43−0.49
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.74−0.22−0.55−0.25−0.61−0.33−0.25−0.25
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.57−0.48·−0.25−0.55−0.22−0.44−0.56
Legitimacy crisis−0.22·−0.44−0.22−0.52−0.72−0.59··
Energy supply shock−0.06−0.39−0.15−0.16−0.16−0.37−0.43−0.42−0.37
Hybrid campaign−0.19−0.42−0.45·−0.46−0.43·−0.17−0.17
Food and water shock−0.02−0.21−0.10−0.26−0.25−0.27−0.12−0.21−0.24
Mass displacement·−0.17−0.12−0.34−0.28−0.38−0.16−0.02·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Malaysia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+37.839.71.95330Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Great-power détente S18 ↗Gainer+19.844.724.96532Diplomatic Statecraft & Global Networks 12 · Established
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Gainer+19.739.119.45023Artificial Intelligence 8.3 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+15.629.614.16141Energy Infrastructure 11 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+12.922.49.55115Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 8.6 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+9.627.117.65344Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+6.713.76.95545Biotechnology & Health Technologies 9.4 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+6.58.01.55460Transparency, Oversight & Accountability 9.3 · Transitional
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−0.517.718.259142Energy Infrastructure 11 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−17.813.431.350161Energy Technologies 7.6 · Foundational