Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · LBR

Liberia

Baseline index 2.93Rank 172 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years38.5rank 34 of 197 · 3 years: 40.1
Worst case−35.5%Energy supply shock · tail −28.8%
Opportunity · 10 years−5.0rank 116 of 197 · 3 years: −7.0
Best case+13Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 1 of 10
Shock absorbed13%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.10expected index points from best practice
Breadth13 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; low life expectancy at birth; low real gdp per head; remittances relative to gdp; share of population aged under 15; consumer price inflation.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Liberia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.95−1.04−1.17−0.52▼ 726Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.63−0.76−0.89−0.39▼ 123Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 1 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.73−0.73−0.83−0.37▼ 218Maritime Power 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.61−0.70−0.78−0.35▼ 120Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.56−0.69−0.78−0.35▼ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.63−0.68−0.81−0.36▼ 322Resource Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.51−0.63−0.73−0.32▲ 315Economic Output & Productivity 1.2 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.71−0.53−0.66−0.29▼ 213Force Generation & Mobilisation 1.3 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.65−0.48−0.54−0.25▼ 114Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.42−0.46−0.51−0.23▲ 311Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.41−0.37−0.44−0.19▲ 215Energy Infrastructure 1.9 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.33−0.36−0.41−0.18▲ 510Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.38−0.28−0.33−0.14▲ 17Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 3.1 · Nascent
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.16−0.14−0.16−0.07▲ 24Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.04−1.47−0.47−0.63−0.63−1.42−1.68−1.62−1.44
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.64−0.31−0.89−0.80−1.10−1.34−0.80−0.92
Chokepoint closure−0.04−1.24−0.85·−0.56−1.21−0.48−0.97−1.24
Infrastructure collapse−0.23−1.15−0.35−0.41−0.41−1.03−0.96−0.94−0.82
Pandemic−0.23−0.40−0.28−0.97−0.85−0.91−0.85−0.83−0.83
Food and water shock−0.04−0.79−0.30−0.96−0.92−0.98−0.46−0.79−0.90
Global financial crisis−0.13−0.33−0.26−0.66−0.66−0.83−1.11−0.95−0.76
Legitimacy crisis−0.16·−0.68−0.42−0.99−1.38−1.13··
Single-supplier cut-off−0.23−0.30−0.33−0.48·−0.98·−0.99−0.99
AI diffusion shock−0.19−0.28−0.22−0.76−0.57−0.78−0.66−0.37−0.33
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.76−0.20−0.57−0.25−0.64−0.34−0.25−0.25
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.16−0.22−0.17·−0.50−0.49−0.50−0.49−0.74
Mass displacement·−0.28−0.19−0.58−0.47−0.65−0.28−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.04−0.25−0.23·−0.28−0.26·−0.10−0.10

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Liberia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+13.214.71.41756Investment Attraction & Projection 2.7 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+8.212.23.92339Financial Regulation & Integrity 4 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+4.58.74.21059Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+2.19.47.31179Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+0.97.86.99129Energy Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+0.910.19.219136Energy Infrastructure 2.9 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−3.14.87.915126Export Capability & Sophistication 2.3 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed−6.65.211.811181Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−11.310.922.111159Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.8 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−20.72.222.96106Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception