Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · KEN

Kenya

Baseline index 7.18Rank 79 of 197FoundationalAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years15.3rank 113 of 197 · 3 years: 14.8
Worst case−12.4%Energy supply shock · tail −11.2%
Opportunity · 10 years+11.7rank 40 of 197 · 3 years: +10.4
Best case+27Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 6 of 10
Shock absorbed29%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.83expected index points from best practice
Breadth0 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Legitimacy crisis, Chokepoint closure. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; staple foods among the top five imports; land borders with states in conflict or collapse; little renewable water per head; share of population aged under 15; refugees hosted per head of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Kenya’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Energy supply shock S09High 0.92−0.89−1.19−0.52▼ 727Energy Technologies 1.5 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.95−0.86−1.25−0.55▼ 1023Resource Infrastructure 4 · Nascent
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.66−0.66−0.95−0.41▼ 120Sovereign Capital & External Financial Power 4.6 · Nascent
Infrastructure collapse S12Medium 0.56−0.60−0.80−0.35▲ 117Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.4 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.67−0.59−0.79−0.35▼ 418Maritime Power 2 · Inception
Mass displacement S08High 0.93−0.55−0.82−0.36▼ 312Internal Security & Order 5.8 · Nascent
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.53−0.54−0.78−0.34▲ 216Labour & Employment 5.7 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.77−0.52−0.79−0.34▼ 112Information Environment & Strategic Communication 6.1 · Foundational
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.51−0.50−0.69−0.31▲ 213Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.42−0.47−0.65−0.29▲ 312Biotechnology & Health Technologies 4.3 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10High 0.61−0.45−0.66−0.29▼ 110Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 5.8 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.48−0.35−0.48−0.21▲ 18Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.24−0.23−0.34−0.15▲ 46Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.5 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.27−0.22−0.30−0.1306Sensing, Timing & Navigation 1.3 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Energy supply shock−0.21−1.24−0.46−0.52−0.52−1.16−1.38−1.33−1.18
Food and water shock−0.10−0.98−0.44−1.20−1.14−1.22−0.57−0.98−1.12
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.55−0.31−0.76−0.68−0.94−1.14−0.68−0.78
Infrastructure collapse−0.75−0.87−0.31−0.31−0.31−0.78−0.73−0.71−0.62
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.97−0.82·−0.43−0.93−0.37−0.75−0.96
Mass displacement·−0.56−0.42−1.15−0.94−1.29−0.55−0.07·
Global financial crisis−0.27−0.27−0.24−0.54−0.54−0.68−0.90−0.77−0.62
Legitimacy crisis−0.38·−0.76−0.38−0.89−1.24−1.02··
AI diffusion shock−0.65−0.28−0.25−0.73−0.55−0.76−0.64−0.35−0.31
Pandemic−0.50−0.25−0.20−0.60−0.53−0.57−0.53−0.52−0.52
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.93−0.28−0.69−0.31−0.77−0.41−0.31−0.31
Single-supplier cut-off−0.68−0.18−0.24−0.29·−0.59·−0.60−0.60
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.30−0.12−0.11·−0.29−0.28−0.29−0.29−0.43
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.36−0.39·−0.40−0.37·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Kenya is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+26.930.03.1385Technical & Vocational Skills 7 · Foundational
Yield revolution S22 ↗Gainer+26.629.73.1331Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.2 · Nascent
Energy abundance S16 ↗Gainer+24.425.30.92845Energy Technologies 3.6 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Gainer+21.726.14.44144Energy Infrastructure 7.3 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Gainer+16.823.56.73222Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.2 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+16.419.22.8429Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 8 · Foundational
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+10.027.017.03225Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 4 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+4.59.85.33882Export Capability & Sophistication 6.3 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+3.111.68.532118Biotechnology & Health Technologies 5.2 · Nascent
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−16.67.824.42083Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 1 · Inception