Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Latin America and Caribbean · JAM

Jamaica

Baseline index 6.24Rank 94 of 197FoundationalLatin America and CaribbeanAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Holding ground. Mid-table on both: neither badly hit nor well placed. One of 43 nations with a similar pattern of results.

High stakes over 10 years: higher vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years18.8rank 97 of 197 · 3 years: 18.1
Worst case−14.0%Infrastructure collapse · tail −13.0%
Opportunity · 10 years−1.2rank 89 of 197 · 3 years: +0.1
Best case+14Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 2 of 10
Shock absorbed27%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.92expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Global financial crisis, Energy supply shock, AI diffusion shock. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; public debt relative to gdp; remittances relative to gdp; internet users as a share of population.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Jamaica’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.80−0.88−1.10−0.49▼ 222Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03High 0.78−0.78−1.15−0.51▼ 224Economic Output & Productivity 3.9 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.70−0.78−1.05−0.47▲ 125Biotechnology & Health Technologies 1.1 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.78−0.76−1.00−0.44▼ 121Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.72−0.71−1.04−0.45▼ 423Energy Infrastructure 4.4 · Nascent
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.67−0.67−0.88−0.39▲ 124Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.57−0.59−0.77−0.35▼ 118Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.64−0.59−0.75−0.33▼ 216Maritime Power 1.3 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.75−0.50−0.74−0.33▼ 114Information Environment & Strategic Communication 3.9 · Nascent
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.56−0.41−0.61−0.27013Energy Infrastructure 4.8 · Nascent
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.46−0.34−0.44−0.20▲ 115Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11Medium 0.36−0.33−0.47−0.21012Resource Infrastructure 5 · Nascent
Mass displacement S08Medium 0.43−0.25−0.38−0.17▲ 16Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 7 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.24−0.21−0.27−0.12▲ 27Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0.3 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Infrastructure collapse−0.81−1.33−0.47−0.47−0.47−1.18−1.10−1.08−0.95
Global financial crisis−0.37−0.40−0.36−0.79−0.79−0.99−1.32−1.13−0.90
Pandemic−0.69−0.42−0.35−1.02−0.90−0.96−0.90−0.88−0.88
Energy supply shock−0.16−1.07−0.40−0.45−0.45−1.00−1.19−1.15−1.02
Sovereign funding crisis−0.07−0.59−0.33−0.82−0.74−1.01−1.23−0.74−0.84
AI diffusion shock−0.69−0.38−0.34−1.02−0.76−1.05−0.89−0.49−0.44
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.57−0.32−0.29·−0.75−0.73−0.75−0.74−1.11
Chokepoint closure−0.07−0.97−0.80·−0.43−0.93−0.37−0.74−0.96
Legitimacy crisis−0.35·−0.73−0.37−0.86−1.20−0.99··
Disaster in the core−0.03−0.84−0.25−0.62−0.28−0.70−0.37−0.28−0.28
Single-supplier cut-off−0.56−0.19−0.24−0.30·−0.60·−0.61−0.61
Food and water shock−0.04−0.37−0.17−0.46−0.44−0.47−0.22−0.37−0.43
Mass displacement·−0.25−0.19−0.52−0.42−0.58−0.25−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.16−0.35−0.38·−0.39−0.36·−0.15−0.15

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Jamaica is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+14.119.65.63447Energy Infrastructure 5.9 · Nascent
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Gainer+13.115.72.74522Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 8.5 · Foundational
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Mixed+8.814.85.92492Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Mixed+2.115.713.52563Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 2.2 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+1.416.815.320128Energy Technologies 1.6 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed0.013.613.634140Energy Infrastructure 5.9 · Nascent
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−0.916.917.831115Export Capability & Sophistication 5.7 · Nascent
Yield revolution S22 ↗Loser−10.68.719.324148Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Loser−13.714.127.825146Biotechnology & Health Technologies 2.6 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−20.48.228.615101Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0.3 · Inception