Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Indo-Pacific · IDN

Indonesia

Baseline index 9.97Rank 47 of 197TransitionalIndo-PacificAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Climbers. Moderate vulnerability, and the most to gain from catch-up. One of 34 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Well placed over 10 years: lower vulnerability, higher opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years8.1rank 165 of 197 · 3 years: 8.1
Worst case−6.2%AI diffusion shock · tail −5.9%
Opportunity · 10 years+6.8rank 56 of 197 · 3 years: +8.1
Best case+23100-day pandemic defence · gainer in 3 of 10
Shock absorbed40%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+0.42expected index points from best practice
Breadth3 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkSemiconductors & Advanced Computingweakest point in 3 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: AI diffusion shock, Geoeconomic confrontation, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: oil, gas and coal among the top five exports of a net exporter; earthquake, storm, flood, drought and volcanic hazards named for the nation; industry as a share of gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Indonesia’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
AI diffusion shock S13High 0.68−0.62−0.94−0.41019Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10High 0.92−0.58−1.00−0.44▼ 115Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 8 · Foundational
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.62−0.58−0.90−0.39018Sensing, Timing & Navigation 4.2 · Nascent
Pandemic S14High 0.60−0.57−0.93−0.41▲ 116Biotechnology & Health Technologies 7.5 · Foundational
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.50−0.42−0.75−0.33▲ 110Labour & Employment 8.2 · Foundational
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Medium 0.51−0.41−0.72−0.32▲ 115Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.4 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02High 0.74−0.41−0.75−0.33014Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 2.1 · Inception
Sovereign funding crisis S04Medium 0.43−0.36−0.62−0.27011Energy Infrastructure 8.9 · Foundational
Energy supply shock S09Medium 0.46−0.36−0.60−0.26▲ 112Energy Technologies 6 · Nascent
Legitimacy crisis S07Medium 0.55−0.34−0.56−0.25▼ 18Information Environment & Strategic Communication 8.7 · Foundational
Chokepoint closure S05Medium 0.43−0.29−0.51−0.22▲ 17Energy Infrastructure 8.9 · Foundational
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.34−0.24−0.38−0.17▲ 19Sensing, Timing & Navigation 5.1 · Nascent
Food and water shock S11Low 0.32−0.24−0.42−0.19▼ 17Population Health 8.1 · Foundational
Mass displacement S08Low 0.21−0.11−0.19−0.08▲ 25Labour & Employment 8.9 · Foundational

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
AI diffusion shock−0.81−0.34−0.30−0.90−0.67−0.93−0.79−0.43−0.39
Disaster in the core−0.04−1.20−0.36−0.89−0.40−1.00−0.54−0.40−0.40
Infrastructure collapse−0.72−0.85−0.30−0.30−0.30−0.75−0.70−0.69−0.60
Pandemic−0.61−0.30−0.25−0.74−0.65−0.69−0.65−0.63−0.63
Global financial crisis−0.21−0.21−0.19−0.42−0.42−0.53−0.71−0.61−0.49
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.53−0.22−0.20·−0.51−0.50−0.51−0.50−0.76
Single-supplier cut-off−0.80−0.21−0.28−0.34·−0.69·−0.70−0.70
Sovereign funding crisis−0.04−0.30−0.17−0.42−0.38−0.52−0.63−0.38−0.43
Energy supply shock−0.08−0.50−0.19−0.21−0.21−0.47−0.55−0.53−0.47
Legitimacy crisis−0.25·−0.51−0.25−0.59−0.82−0.67··
Chokepoint closure−0.04−0.47−0.40·−0.21−0.45−0.18−0.36−0.47
Hybrid campaign−0.18−0.39−0.42·−0.43−0.40·−0.16−0.16
Food and water shock−0.03−0.28−0.13−0.34−0.32−0.35−0.16−0.28−0.32
Mass displacement·−0.11−0.08−0.22−0.18−0.25−0.11−0.01·

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Indonesia is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Gainer+22.725.12.34655Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8.6 · Foundational
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Gainer+17.129.512.55034Technical & Vocational Skills 9 · Transitional
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Gainer+13.623.19.64213Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 6.4 · Foundational
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed+8.324.816.55664Export Capability & Sophistication 10.7 · Transitional
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+7.79.72.05349Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 10 · Transitional
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+7.116.19.04842Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8.6 · Foundational
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed+4.025.521.54665Biotechnology & Health Technologies 8.6 · Foundational
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Mixed−1.021.422.43148Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 3.3 · Nascent
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed−5.917.723.653160Energy Infrastructure 9.6 · Transitional
Energy abundance S16 ↗Loser−25.815.441.243165Energy Technologies 6.8 · Foundational