Scenarios 2027 / Results / Nations

Africa · GNB

Guinea-Bissau

Baseline index 2.08Rank 188 of 197InceptionAfricaAtlas profile

Read with care Second illustrative run, with exposure set nation by nation. The capability scores are candidate ratings and the test settings are GINC desk settings; neither has been adopted. Scores are from the GINC National Capability Index 2026, which describes them as candidate ratings. Exposure is set nation by nation from the CIA World Factbook 2025 and the scenario's regional exposure. Results show the method working on real scores; they are not findings about any nation. How the tests work.

Vulnerability and opportunity

Archetype: Fragile, with upside. Highly vulnerable, but in line for debt relief and higher yields. One of 25 nations with a similar pattern of results.

Exposed over 10 years: higher vulnerability, lower opportunity than the median nation.

Vulnerability · 10 years54.5rank 12 of 197 · 3 years: 53.9
Worst case−48.4%Energy supply shock · tail −44.4%
Opportunity · 10 years−9.3rank 153 of 197 · 3 years: −12.3
Best case+9Emerging-market breakout · gainer in 0 of 10
Shock absorbed9%by its own buffers, across downside scenarios
Policy dividend+1.14expected index points from best practice
Breadth14 of 14scenarios in which a domain falls a band
Weakest linkAdvanced Materials & Manufacturingweakest point in 2 scenarios

Main drivers of vulnerability over 10 years: Energy supply shock, Chokepoint closure, Global financial crisis. Highest exposure indicators: share of oil and gas use not met by domestic production; share of population aged under 15; low real gdp per head; low life expectancy at birth; remittances relative to gdp.

Downside scenarios: load test

Change in Guinea-Bissau’s capability index under each scenario at Standard Severe and current plans, largest fall first.

ScenarioExposureChangeNo responseBest practiceRank shiftBands lostWeakest point
Sovereign funding crisis S04High 0.80−1.00−1.11−0.50▼ 320Energy Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Energy supply shock S09High 0.92−1.00−1.07−0.50▼ 217Energy Technologies 0 · Inception
Food and water shock S11High 0.67−0.76−0.86−0.38019Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Infrastructure collapse S12High 0.61−0.70−0.75−0.34015Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0 · Inception
Chokepoint closure S05High 0.68−0.69−0.74−0.34014Resource Infrastructure 0 · Inception
Global financial crisis S03Medium 0.54−0.68−0.76−0.34018Business Dynamism & Entrepreneurship 0.3 · Inception
Pandemic S14Medium 0.48−0.60−0.66−0.29▲ 216Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0 · Inception
Legitimacy crisis S07High 0.69−0.56−0.61−0.28▼ 111Information Environment & Strategic Communication 0 · Inception
AI diffusion shock S13Medium 0.45−0.50−0.53−0.24▲ 215Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception
Single-supplier cut-off S02Medium 0.50−0.37−0.40−0.1808Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Disaster in the core S10Medium 0.39−0.37−0.42−0.18▲ 114Energy Infrastructure 1.1 · Inception
Geoeconomic confrontation S01Low 0.22−0.26−0.28−0.12▲ 48Advanced Materials & Manufacturing 0 · Inception
Mass displacement S08Low 0.32−0.25−0.28−0.12▲ 211Water, Sanitation & Waste Infrastructure 2.4 · Inception
Hybrid campaign S06Low 0.17−0.16−0.17−0.08▲ 38Sensing, Timing & Navigation 0 · Inception

Where each scenario lands

Change in each of the nine capability domains, in points. Darker is a larger fall.

ScenarioCTSINSHCIIGIFSPITI
Sovereign funding crisis−0.02−0.85−0.40−1.19−1.06−1.47−1.76−1.06−1.22
Energy supply shock−0.02−1.28−0.47−0.64−0.64−1.44−1.70−1.48−1.38
Food and water shock−0.02−0.83−0.33−1.08−1.03−1.11−0.52−0.88−1.01
Infrastructure collapse−0.11−1.15−0.35−0.42−0.42−1.06−0.99−0.97−0.85
Chokepoint closure−0.02−1.11−0.71·−0.55−1.17−0.47−0.94−1.20
Global financial crisis−0.11−0.36−0.28−0.72−0.72−0.90−1.20−1.03−0.82
Pandemic−0.11−0.36−0.25−0.87−0.76−0.81−0.76−0.74−0.74
Legitimacy crisis−0.11·−0.71−0.46−0.99−1.50−1.23··
AI diffusion shock−0.11−0.31−0.24−0.83−0.63−0.86−0.73−0.40−0.36
Single-supplier cut-off−0.11−0.24−0.27−0.38·−0.78·−0.79−0.79
Disaster in the core−0.02−0.77−0.20−0.57−0.26−0.64−0.34−0.26−0.26
Geoeconomic confrontation−0.10−0.15−0.12·−0.36−0.34−0.36−0.35−0.52
Mass displacement·−0.25−0.17−0.51−0.42−0.58−0.24−0.03·
Hybrid campaign−0.05−0.28−0.26·−0.31−0.29·−0.12−0.12

Columns: CT Critical Technology · SI Strategic Infrastructure · NS National Security · HC Human Capital · II Information & Influence · GI Governance & Integrity · FS Financial Strength · PI Production & Innovation · TI Trade & Investment.

Upside scenarios: capture test

Net position in each upside scenario: what Guinea-Bissau is ready to capture, less what it stands to lose.

ScenarioPositionNetCaptureLossReadinessRankBinding capability
Emerging-market breakout S20 ↗Mixed+8.510.31.81285Investment Attraction & Projection 2 · Inception
Sovereign debt reset S19 ↗Mixed+5.49.54.21477Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption 2.5 · Inception
Energy abundance S16 ↗Mixed+3.95.21.36119Energy Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Yield revolution S22 ↗Mixed+1.15.54.4791Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Middle East settlement S21 ↗Mixed+0.56.96.413138Energy Infrastructure 2.1 · Inception
Biomedical breakthroughs S17 ↗Mixed−0.75.96.6792Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Great-power détente S18 ↗Mixed−6.12.48.510146Export Capability & Sophistication 1.7 · Inception
100-day pandemic defence S24 ↗Loser−10.22.712.86190Biotechnology & Health Technologies 0.2 · Inception
Digital state leapfrog S23 ↗Loser−18.96.825.77184Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies 0.4 · Inception
Superintelligence takeoff S15 ↗Loser−23.61.725.24129Semiconductors & Advanced Computing 0 · Inception